Baltimore Ravens Live: Ravens rework deals, starters find other teams, Lamar news, more



Baltimore Ravens Live: Ravens rework deals, starters find other teams, Lamar news, more

source

42 thoughts on “Baltimore Ravens Live: Ravens rework deals, starters find other teams, Lamar news, more”

  1. bu-bu-but the LJ Fanboys were telling me all year that every team without a qb was gonna try getting lamar, and if we don't wanna pay him then they will. 🤣

    Reply
  2. I think the ravens need to get rid of lamar. It’s like having a gf/bf. You should not have to fight tooth and nail to keep them, as it is a partnership, as you guys alluded to earlier, and if one side does not want to stay, then the ravens should have confidence in their ability to find another qb who actually wants to be here. Lamar is driving everyone crazy and even if he does come back, I won’t be happy to see him under center for us, as it is clear he only cares about himself, and doesn’t give a damn about this team or his teammates. (Side note but how many game winning go ahead TOUCHDOWN drives has lamar generated for us? I can’t remember a single one off the top of my head and he’s been our quarterback for 5 YEARS! I am not counting field goals because we have Justin tucker and field goal range for him doesn’t require us to drive down the field too much. Just as lamar showed us during his time with us, when you need him most, he doesn’t deliver and it is applying again in the contract negotiations, or lack thereof on one’s end).

    Reply
  3. When you look at Lamar’s history, he doesn’t seem to trust anyone. He doesn’t trust an Agent, he wouldn’t get the vaccine because he didn’t trust it, he used his own Trainer because he didn’t trust the Ravens and he wouldn’t play because he didn’t trust the doctors. Maybe that’s just him.

    Reply
  4. I recommend you boys watch what Pat Mcafee said in his show about the Lamar contract. Also, Lamar won passing the ball in 2019, but we only were shown more highlights of his running than passing making you think the GRo system made him better when it not, it was just a way to ease him in the speed of the NFL because remember Lamar in college played under a Pro Passing Scheme that open up lanes for him to run in case everyone was covered. In 2020 he complained about the system and in you recall in 2021 he wanted to pass cause of no RBs and Harbs didn't let him for 3 quarters until it was save us Lamar time like in the colts game. Last year you send Hollywood away and didn't replace him, everyone was calling GRo to go before the season started cause we all knew you cant replicate 2019, they tried and failed. Lamar is the offense and there is no game scheme since 2020 because they know Lamar will save them because of his talent. Its a way to sabotage a player to get him for cheap on offense like we did with our WRs and with Flacco post SB. cause in 2016 we redid his contract to go get "weapons" and we got none, same with 2017, and nothing happened. But "Defense wins championships" not since the 2000 Ravens, rules have changed and offenses wins SBs but Bisciotti is not into that, if he did we would have given Lamar weapons after 2019, he would have sign him in 2020 to an Allen type deal, he wouldn't just offer 133 at signing and 42 later on IN THOSE 3 years!!, Yes the 175 is only for 3 years IF he gets hurt which tells you that after that happens they can cut him loose BEFORE getting to the 200mil in year 3!!! So Lamar is correct on saying 133mil for 3 years in a 5 year contract is guaranteed cause if he get injured and the type of injury he got is not listed in the injury guaranteed he looses the money and can get cut for that, like your insurance, your insurance doesnt cover this so so sorry PAY IT WITH YOUR OWN MONEY!

    Reply
  5. ATL isn't out because of Heineke because if a trade is done with Atlanta Im sure they will send Ridder to us. We can't get a QB unless we get the Raiders pick or higher unless we trade up so they better give us Ridder. The media is dogging Ridder but I've been on ATLs fan pages and they love him and most of their fans actually don't want Lamar. They have been saying it for months. I think PFF was high on him too last year, whatever that matters. As far as the Raiders, Jimmy Gs name didn't come up much I. FA. Idk how much the Raiders paid him but it's possible they told him he may or may not be the starter. And if that was his only or highest offer he would take it. But if he got starter money then the Raiders are out.

    Reply
  6. Thanks for what y'all do. Just like the morning vault with Bobby and Sarah. Y'all give level headed takes and don't breed pessimism and hate for the franchise like another YouTuber and his fans

    Reply
  7. When Lamar win MVP in 2019, and the ENTIRE football world saw how special he is, they should have locked him up then. The Bulls were smart, they took care of Alen BEFORE the Watson 230 contract. Once Alwn signed, the Ravens should have locked up Lamar!

    Reply
  8. They waited too ling! This is on them. They were too comfortable paying a Unanimous MVP 1.7 million dollars!!! Shame in them for not having the foresight. Hes been severely underpaid his entire time as a Raven! Guess what, The Bills Come Due!

    Reply
  9. What has Baltimore done to foster trust with Lamar since 2018? I'm asking honestly.

    Look at the moves (or lack thereof) over the course of the past five years and see if they help or hurt Lamar thus far.

    Reply
  10. 🤣🤣🤣… So, after touching the ball over 2300 times (running + passing) over the past 5 years, accounting for nearly 70% of the offensive production while investing the least amount of capital into relative to the league during that span…

    For $32M TOTAL EARNINGS over his career ($23M of which was in YEAR 5)…

    The Ravens want MORE FLEXIBILITY WITHOUT COMPENSATION?!!?

    Thee words:
    1 – Fuck
    2 – Outta
    3 – Here

    Reply
  11. Everyone has their opinion. Fact is, we respect yours, respect his. He sees it the way he does and he has his reasons. We all just want him signed. Some say pay, some say move on but it’s all because we want it done and over with. He’s willing to wait. The Ravens are willing to let other offers dictate what they want to do next. So we have to wait it out. That’s the facts. If LJ wins this battle, all other QBs will be thanking him for his stance from here on.

    Reply
  12. I think that LJ WANTS the Ravens specifically to pay him. He doesn’t want it from anyone else. But he wants his money. He wants more than Watson in every way. It’s big to him.

    Reply
  13. 46:00 This is the type of propaganda thats being put out to slander Lamar and you guys are falling for it.Notice how they have the full number of years next to all the QBs but for Lamar it has 3 years to try and make his average guaranteed number look higher.The truth is the Ravens offered him a 6 year deal so if you put his correct years up his average would be 22.15 mill annual guaranteed which is lower than everybody on the list.Ravens fans just don’t want to admit the front office has fumbled this whole situation by lowballing Lamar.I guess it’s easier for yall to pretend like Lamar is being greedy by not accepting this low offer from the Ravens.The offer was 6 years 290 mill with an out after 3 years.If Lamar was cut after the 3 years he’d only get 133 mill.The 175 and 200 mill guaranteed numbers are complete bullshit

    Reply
  14. If Lamar fails to get any offers, as it seems likely, and wants to re-engage with the Ravens, I hope the Ravens bring up their last great offer they had for him, but with significant reductions commensurate with his true worth. It has become fashionable to say Deshaun Watsons deal is “one-off.” Careful analysis more than suggests it is Lamar’s MVP that is one-off!! The Ravens bold new offensive approach implemented by Lamar, caught the league off guard. Consider the can of whoop-ass the Ravens put on the Rams in a nationally televised game – one year before the Rams wIn the SB. Where the Rams that bad, or unprepared for new concept offense?

    Reply
  15. The deal the Ravens were pushing out to Lamar is pure TRASH! No matter how you two homers try to make it alright. It just is not. Cheap arse Ravens team deserves what they get. They should have signed Lamar two years ago!

    Reply
  16. You two need to show your official Ravens pay checks! Biased anyone?

    raye menears

    You two need to show your official Ravens pay checks! Biased anyone!

    Cancel

    Save

    raye menears

    raye menears

    1 second ago

    Reply
  17. The Lamar tweet is easy to understand… He's pointing out the contradicting narratives around his contract. People want to call him out for not taking the money, while also saying he needs an agent to get paid. He got an offer that would make him PAID, he just knows he should get more

    Reply
  18. Lamar told yall his contract and you so fucking unbelievably munching on the ravens crouch cant even see they lied he told yall what HE WAS OFFERED wtf am i missing here

    Reply
  19. I do not believe the ravens or Lamar leaked it you’re they have been loyal to each other, and not trying to cross the lines of pissing each other off no matter what ESPN says There, too loyal I think the NFL PA leaked it.

    Reply
  20. Why are you guys saying that this is partnership? That’s crazy talk there’s not even a partnership between coaches. So Lamar deserves subpar money and he should just accept it.

    Reply
  21. Why is the news media able to see Lamar’s contract? That was all the ravens trying to put his business out there to make him look bad I hope Lamar doesn’t play in Baltimore ever again they don’t deserve a play like him

    Reply
  22. See you guys are really really crazy. The two years that we were first and second off next was because of Lamar. It wasn’t because of Greg Roman and a damn sure wasn’t because of Joe Flacco y’all trippin

    Reply

Leave a Comment