USSC Foreign Policy and Defence Director Professor Peter Dean says as Australia is an island continent dependent on maritime trade and security, AUKUS nuclear submarines are the “pinnacle of naval capability”.
“The sharing of US technology is key because they are the most advanced submarines in the world,” Mr Dean told Sky News Australia.
“This will ensure that Australia maintains a regional military capability edge in the underwater domain, which is one of the most important.”
source
Was that JFK'S daughter at the AUKUS meeting, why is she there? Hitler had 46 Submarines in his fleet, but still lost the war. We will have 3 in 20 years time let's hope China behaves like a good boy until our 3 submarines are built, what a joke, $368 billion and counting, these won't be of any use by the time they are built, the lunatics are running the asylum, do we really think that 3 subs will save us from annihilation, oh please China don't attack us before they are built, if you believe this then you believe in climate change, because it is climate VARIATION you fools, god save the world from these fools.
If Australia was in an armed conflict with China there would be no need to protect our "trade". As just about every thing we use these days comes from China, ships bring goods to Australia would near disappear immediately.
You will win all underwater wars.
Look in the water is it 3 AUKUS submarines. More powerful than a locomotive able to sink vessels in a single strike and who disguised as our protector, is 3 submarines in 10 15 or is it 20 years time, as Carol King sang it's too late baby, it's too late.
It's like a rabbit fighting a T. Rex.
🇨🇳 happy have🚢🛩🛰🚀🛸submarine with icbm🚀 surround f aukus..🏯🦼🛺🚲🛶 kangaroo 🦘🦘 boasting buy sub ready after 30 years run only with nuclear .. 🇺🇸 🐍🐍sell gun without bullets what a laughing 😃 😀 movie 🎬 🎞 🎥..
we like it ..🦈🦈 without teeth ..
Massive waste of money
lol rubbish
and the Army needs all that has been promised to them as well
With that amount of money, it would have been better to build 50 destroyers which cost much cheaper
Welcome to the nuclear age, Australia.
If China worries about a few obsolete sub's this is just all for a bullshit smokescreen , a load of nonsense to fool the public once again.
Millions of Aborigines live in poverty and jobless and staying in the country and outback
Yet another excuse to bring in more migrant "skilled" workers to perform low skilled jobs and further entrench underemployment and hidden unemployment.
Verry bad all no even this big Efficet Foces bicouses like 3 tears bibiy this one Fetboll family and Riginale women
Ripite all 100% fules even daudi scoallership Abiy family and differences Abiy rilition ferineds I do no women no ementf Foces big effices offices Presnale home all side this plane scuirty Abiy
Plane all where good side this fore years Attinede and
Showe Compition even ifficale disotion one Fetboll Tiffe big atked no fules all Cantry atintion all and Foces Atked and big Efficet one Fetboll
No women silines but g Tiffe
One Fetboll and one Fetboll family
You need to show China…oz don't play games !!
Reportedly the new subs won't have nuclear capabilities. Isn't that like buying a firearm and not having any ammunition?
Why go nuclear submarines? I would opt to go with Space Nuclear hypersonic missiles like the Chinese. Imagine China start selling Space Nuclear Hypersonic Missiles like the one they tested last year circling around the Earth before vertically diving down. Hell, imagine every country will want at least 10-20 of their own. It's coming.
Ever gonna Nuke anyone or just a completely waste of money. This is to admit that both could nuke each other. You nuke china and china nuke you back 😂😂😂😂😂
life cycle 25 years and 4 to be built you will have no more 2 at most in fleet perhaps 1 at sea
This will also be a stepping stone for Australia to get nuclear power stations in the future , which is a no brainer………..
This guy is a goof