Asking Atheists The ONE Question They HATE!



Asking Atheists The ONE Question They HATE! When an atheist claims science disproves God, this preacher explains why the universe’s beginning points directly to a Creator. The Bible says in Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” This verse reminds us that everything has a beginning—and only God could have caused it.

#shorts #creationtruth #atheistvschristian #biblicalscience

source

50 thoughts on “Asking Atheists The ONE Question They HATE!”

  1. The questioner asks how time could start on existing matter and energy. There is a problem with this.

    If matter and energy exists so does time and space.

    This is the problem with the proposals that are based on quantum fluctuations. Both time and space are required for this to give rise to matter and energy.

    Either space, time, matter and energy came into existence simultaneously or space, time, matter and energy are eternal and have always existed.

    Reply
  2. Why do the courts not accept God as the truth then. If they did people could just make the argument that God told me to do it. It's really a stupid argument. Religion is based on belief alone no facts.

    Reply
  3. “Something came from nothing…” the poster of this video obviously doesn’t understand science any better than the street preacher.

    Something came from nothing is a preconceived notion in the guise of a logical argument. Unfortunately not all logical arguments lead to empirical truths. Plug that claim into a logical argument… that something came from nothing.

    First of all, the person making such an argument hasn’t demonstrated there was nothing beforehand. The suggestion there was nothing can’t even be proven one way or another because you can’t prove something that doesn’t exist. And that’s because if it didn’t exist there’d be no evidence of its existence !! Duh.

    People can fashion what appears to be a logical argument but unless all the premises used in such an argument are already known to represent fact, then no rigorous or reliable conclusion can be achieved. False or unproven premises make the argument false.

    Evidently the producer of this video& the theist speaker here doesn’t understand logic as well as they pretend.

    Reply
  4. Disprove religion isn't "Cargo Cults" also explain how this is all true when the original ancient texts to prove and or disprove these religious ideologies are buried and have been buried intentionally underneath the Vatican or in one of their other expansive archives instead of being on display in a museum for the entire world to view to officially put everything to rest ?

    Since they haven't and probably never will I'm going to say it's because it will disprove it.

    However there are some truths once you know the original story and can be easily pointed out in the bible.

    Reply
  5. More like the street preacher doesn't know enough about the science.
    Nothing is literally impossible. Even if the universe had an absolute beginning There are be no nothing before the universe because there would be no before the universe. You can't have a time before the existence of time.

    Reply
  6. Science has never claimed that there was a beginning. The Big Bang theory is just an expansion. It does not speak of a beginning you clowns for Christ. I’ve got to do better than this.

    Reply
  7. The universe had a beginning out of nothing because Stuart Little said so???

    No, we don't know if there is such a state as nothing. Even the Big Bang theory states that all matter and energy were concentrated in a singularity, a point, not nothing.

    Nobody claims to have mathematical understanding or modeling which is capable of explaining the first few picoseconds of a Big Bang.

    Con artists like this street preacher and his Dad (old man Ricketts, Cliffe) shout and talk confidently. They make claims about scientific ideas which fundamentally misrepresent them.

    Reply
  8. One thing I always see from these preachers when they are asked about the evidence for God, they always say something like this guy" how can something come from nothing? "Everything has to have a creator".
    but that's an argument for deism not theism. This man is here to preach Christianity, but he knows that trying to convince people that someone was born of a virgin mother, died for everyone's sins and then was resurrected is a bit of a hard pill for people to swallow, so they revert back to a more palatable less absurd claim that people might have a less difficult time debunking. It's a classic Mott and Bailey fallacy.

    Reply
  9. Atheists are idiots; our physical laws are consistent and deterministic. We don't wake up every day hoping that the sun would rise in the east—it just does! so, how can we believe that the origin of our natural laws was dependent on chance when these laws themselves are not random? the answer: we can't! Our universe did not originate by chance.

    Reply
  10. The Christian cip out. Everything has to come from a creator. Something can't come from nothing. Atheist says who created god? Christian says god has always been. ULTIMATE COP-OUT CIRCLE WALK! 😅🤣😂 😇🤪

    Reply
  11. Science does not say there was a beginning to everything. We don’t know is the answer, we can not see past the plank time which is the billionth of a billionth of a second after the Big Bang event happened. Atheists don’t believe everything came from nothing, people that believe in god do. In the Bible it says there was only god and nothing else, then god made everything out of nothing.

    Reply
  12. How can something exist out of space and time? You know what we call something that exists outside of space and time? We call it nothing or something that doesn’t exist. We have no evidence of outside space and time.

    Reply
  13. If energy is eternal, then, according to 2 LoT (entropy) all extant matter would have been spent and ceased to do work an infinite amount of time ago. The universe would have died a heat death an infinite account of time ago, and our universe never would have formed. Yet, here we are…

    Reply

Leave a Comment