Analysis: How Australia’s donated M1A1 Abrams tanks match up against Putin’s arsenal



Following the announcement the Australian government is set to donate 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine, Sky News Political Reporter Cameron Reddin has examined how the tanks match up against Vladimir Putin’s Russian arsenal.

For nearly two decades, the M1A1 Abrams has been Australia’s tank of choice.

The M1A1 Abrams tank is designed to travel over long distances and withstand heavy damage from explosives.

Kyiv has been asking for the Australian equipment to assist in the conflict with Russia, with the vehicles set to have been retired at the end of the year.

source

28 thoughts on “Analysis: How Australia’s donated M1A1 Abrams tanks match up against Putin’s arsenal”

  1. 59 M1A1 AIM SA Abrams were purchased to replace the Leopard AS1 in service with the 1st Armoured Regiment. The first M1 equipped sub-units of the regiment became operational in mid-2007. Under LAND 907 Phase 2, the M1A1 will be upgraded to the M1A2 through replacement. The Army has ordered 75 M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams to be delivered from 2024. 49 M1A1 Abrams will be sent to Ukraine…

    The Defense Department late last week notified Congress of a possible $475 million-$550 million foreign military sale for M1A1 tanks and related equipment to Australia. In a May 21 statement, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said Australia had requested 59 M1A1 Abrams Integrated Management (AIM) tanks, seven M88A1 medium recovery vehicles, 80 AN/VRC-92F dual long-range Single Channel Ground and Air Radio System (SINCGARS) radios, 146 AN/PVS-7B night vision goggles, 73 M2 .50 caliber machine guns, an additional seven M2 .50 caliber… [Can't find an exact cost].

    A$3.5 billion package including 75 M1A2 SePv3 advanced versions together with other support variants.

    Reply
  2. LMFAO. The M1A1 was obsolete by 1990 first seeing service in 1986. Talk about propaganda. Australia was stupid enough to pay the same price for those refurbished tanks as for new tanks. M1A1s are just deathtraps. Even top of the line British and German tanks have stood no chance. The Minister for Defence Industry has no experience in Defence either a serviceman or in DoD and he was pretending like he knew what he was talking about. Thats what is wrong with this country. You deserve such politicians wrecking your country if you are stupid enough to vote for them. Skys "facts" about Russian tanks are also lies. Russians have modernized their tanks and they have defeated NATO tanks in tank 'duels' many times. Lets donate our politicians. Ukraine desperately needs manpower after the 1.8M casualties.

    Reply
  3. I have noticed in recent times Russia is fitting reactive armour to their tanks , will the Abrahams we send receive the same to help keep them in the fight longer ?, it has also been reported that we are getting replacement tanks what sort has not been dis closed "yet " .

    Reply
  4. Why on earth, is Albo-sleazy giving away our very expensive M1A1 Abram tanks when we fought so long to get them? The Australia Labor Party has only made decisions, that make Australia weaker, so they masters, China can come in & take over with less of a fight! Arrest the government for sedition!

    Reply
  5. 😂😂😂 M1 Abram's is a TOTAL DISASTER despised by the Australian Army useless in Asia too heavy useless in our wet season. It's JET ENINE has to be sent to Israel🇺🇸istan for refurbishment. Shown to be UTTELY USELESS in Ukraine and easily destroyed. Our military never wanted them they were forced on us by Arse Kisser extraordinare John Howard. What's next a Model 50% more expensive and 10 tons heavier. More made in AMURURICA garbage even Russia laughed at how poor they performed in combat. Time to abandon the even more useless B35 Kamakhazi now 27 years past its delivery date 12 of 120 delivered at ASTRONOMICAL COST to the tax payer. As for handing them to UkroNazis guilty of thousands of war crimes it shows just how Israe🇺🇸LISTAN dominates AUSKRAINE yes were Ukraine Mk2 puppet state with bought treasonous politician's VOTE MINOR PARTIES or INDEPENDENT for a free Australia as Tucker Carlson said Why do you have the US Military in Australia DID YOU LOSE A WAR they will never leave they will topple any government that tries to get them out.

    Reply
  6. On top of that new US Tanks will be by loans in US Shekels from US banks for US trash. AUSKRAINE sold out at every turn. In debt to Israelistan🇺🇸 for decades value to us NOTHING . This is what it means to be a puppet state.

    Reply
  7. Great now they can parade these Aussie bought yank tanks in red square once they’re captured by the Russians, hopefully they’ll have 🦘 Kangaroos on the sides so the locals know we sponsored the war against them …honestly we are just arse lickers to the yanks.

    Reply
  8. Most of the Abrams that Russia has destroyed have not been destroyed in tank on tank battles but rather the Abrams, Challengers and Leopards have met their doom by UAVs, antitank missiles, land mines and shoulder held ATGMS. As Putin said Western military equipment will all burn on the steppes of Ukraine. Isn't it time Australia stopped supporting the neo-nazis of Kiev?

    Reply
  9. Why bother ASSessing our tank park – we have NO LETHAL DRONES at all, at a time when the world is going over to drone warfare big time !!! Honestly, Burkina Faso would kick out arses, and so too would Russia, since our tanks would be totally wiped out by drones before they got anywhere near a single Russian tank.

    Reply
  10. I would have thought our military people would have looked at how poorly the Abrams have performed thus far in Ukraine and deiced to invest in UAV'S instead. However given that our likely next foe will be China, if we continue to tag along behind the failing united states of north america, we will be so hopelessly outnumbered we may as well not have a military.

    Reply
  11. Taxpayers 100s of millions of dollars buying these things, tanks, vehicles, planes, etc, and we give it away. Ukraine, Indonesia, to name two. Ukraine Russia conflict, none of our concern, especially when the facts are not being reported. Zalensky is nothing more than an oligarch, removing elected leaders from Ukrainian towns and cities, installing his own puppet government,. Don’t let western media influence you, they are only after Russia. Putin has some credibility when taking about nazi regime within Ukraine. We are just flogging a dead horse, Russia will just keep grinding away until nothing is left, they’ve done it before.

    Reply
  12. I don’t know why these fools keep knocking old Soviet equipment. The Russians keep it because no matter how old it is, armour carries more firepower than soldiers into the frontline, faster and with better protection. We all paid for those tanks with our tax money, and now we won’t be protected by them. The Russians seem to be winning with their outdated equipment and shovels… what does that say about the state of the art equipment donated to Ukraine??

    Reply
  13. Quality advantage? Why did they not reference Russia’s T90 and T-14 Armata tanks in this “analysis”? Both are superior to the Abrams Australia is giving Ukraine and the T90 is produced in much greater quantities.

    Reply
  14. To Cg-dd9tb you have your bubble world and there is the real world where the truth exists look up the BBC News reports, the German,News reports and all the others, sorry but I live in the real world

    Reply

Leave a Comment