AMD EPYC Turin Server Benchmarking and Review! Featuring the Zen5 9575F, 9965, & 9755



It craves the power! It needs the power! 500 watts!

Sooo many benchmarks!: https://forum.level1techs.com/t/amd-epyc-turin-is-out-9575f-benchmarking-w-comsol-phoronix-test-suite/218260

0:00 – Intro
1:20 – Recap
3:05 – Product List
5:42 – Let’s talk about power
6:22 – Benchmarking
13:16 – COMSOL
14:47 – OpenVINO
15:44 – Conclusion

You can find us…
Twitter – https://twitter.com/level1techs
Twitch – https://twitch.tv/teampgp
Patreon – https://www.patreon.com/level1
Discord – https://discord.gg/GUusTDSc

For all our links, check out our link tree!
https://linktr.ee/level1techs

Thank you for watching!

————————————————————————————————————-
*IMPORTANT* Any email lacking “level1techs.com” should be ignored and immediately reported to [email protected].

Music: “Earth Bound” by Slynk

Edited by Autumn

source

37 thoughts on “AMD EPYC Turin Server Benchmarking and Review! Featuring the Zen5 9575F, 9965, & 9755”

  1. AMD are kicking serious goals in the server market. Intel are becoming very unfavorable and AMD is capitalizing in a very lucrative market by making products that clients actually need.

    Reply
  2. *sees AMD has made massive improvements to their Epyc IO-die, giving massive performance-improvements in memory-sensitive tasks* GOD-DAMN YOU AMD FOR NOT GIVING US A NEW IOD FOR DESKTOP! 😢 You cheap bastards…! Had they given us a new IOD on Desktop, the performance on Zen5 could perhaps have been as good as they claimed. Sonnovabitch…

    Reply
  3. I can immediately think of at least two clients where this configuration could reduce an entire farm from 4 units to 1. When we talk about how much power gets used, we have to also take into effect if you can reduce rack space and literal running racks. Reducing down several separated? Oh yeah. I can see CTOs drooling. The huge benefit I'm seeing in regards to mass virtualization is that this changes the entire outlook for possibilities on virtualized remote workstations instead of committing to Remote Desktop platforms. We've been experimenting with this as a way to reduce cost with a few clients, but you make it where you wipe out some of the double licensing cost, provide high level speed and performance, and you make it work.. I am incredibly eager to put a few of these into the field!

    Reply
  4. Slightly off the topic, I thought I share the love. my Ryzen 7800X3D was hitting high temperatures and I tried many thermal pastes but not liquid metal. The BSFF from Nuomi Chemical, the non-silicon, non-conductivity thermal paste is amazing stuff. I was using the highly rated Noctua paste was running 5-6 C higher. I don't know what it's made from and they even claim it outperforms liquid metal. It would be great if we can have some proper tests on BSFF.

    Reply
  5. One benchmark that I'm missing online is not really that important, but it would still be interesting to see on a 192C/384T system is XMR mining, since it's CPU-based and AMD's server chips have been dominating the ranks on the benchmark platform, I really am wondering if these new chips can reach above 200kh/s

    Reply
  6. Zen 5 desktop sure got the poo end of the stick compared to this. Looks like we just needed a new IO die but AMD was too cheap to make a new one. We could also get 24 and 32 core on AM5 with Zen 5C but so far nope. Better memory speed itself on server shows that desktop is getting 100% screwed over. Thanks AMD for not caring about either CPUs or Graphics for desktop while they make really good enterprise AI GPUs and server processors.

    Reply
  7. Currently, vendors known for ISV-certified workstations such as Dell Precision, Z by HP, and Lenovo Thinkstation do not offer models powered by Epyc, only Threadripper Pro.

    Reply
  8. It's almost like adding more cores = more performance on multithreaded workloads. Honestly AMD should just make a 1024 core chip; that'd be better. I don't know why they don't.

    Reply

Leave a Comment