AirTags Expose Dodgy Postal Industry (DHL Responds)



Thanks Brilliant for sponsoring this video! Try Brilliant for free at: https://brilliant.org/MegaLag

AirTagAlex’s Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRIdoZbMq34
TheTravellingAirTags Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn9bRXsVv2g

Chapters:

00:00 – Intro
1:20 – Update on AirTags
2:12 – DHL make first contact
4:17 – Q&A with DHL
10:28 – Tour of DHL facility
22:42 – YouTubers sending AirTags to North Korea
24:09 – Investigating Royal Mail and PostNL
26:09 – Conversation with Royal Mail and PostNL
30:05 – Sending 3 AirTags to North Korea via Royal Mail
31:14 – Parcel and Post Expo & Universal Postal Union
36:00 – Parcel Sorting Simulation
39:01 – Final thoughts
40:42 – Response from DHL

Research:

SNBC Article: https://www.snbc.com.cn/news/577.html
IPC Article on Royal Mail Automation: http://bit.ly/3YrKxLL
PostNL Sorting Center: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu0Al53Lx-A
Royal Mail Sorting Center: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbtYG3J3MTQ
Royal Mail Parcel Volumes: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1006816/royal-mail-volume-of-parcels-and-letters-delivered-uk/

Follow me:

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mega.lag/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MegaLagOfficial

source

40 thoughts on “AirTags Expose Dodgy Postal Industry (DHL Responds)”

  1. Speaking of climate and shipping distances. Australia Post. A few years ago Australia Post would send my packages from Melbourne direct to Finley by road. this is a trip of 289 km. But then something changed they now send packages from Melbourne to Sydney to Albury to Jerilderie and then down to Finley. This is a trip in straight lines of 1,328 km. It adds two extra days onto the shipping time of packages from Melbourne to me. And because it's making all of these extra kilometres by plane I can imagine it's worse for the environment.

    Reply
  2. What they could do is what we used to do in the old days in finance. You double key everything. So if one parcel is keyed by two separate people and the keys don't match it could be automatically routed to a third person for checking. We used to do this in finance where we would key everything twice and then run a comparison between the two keyed files and any errors could be fixed before the batch was run and the information updated.

    Reply
  3. I hope these companies do pay attention to your videos, and consider them valuable contributions to their bottom line. They’re getting a fairly good audit for free, and would be foolish not to capitalize on your work.

    Reply
  4. To be honest. You were testing an edge case. I can't imagine many packages being sent to North Korea. Given that you were bound to run into issues along the way, DHL eventually did the right thing.

    Reply
  5. parcel 1, lost parcel 2 lost, parcel 3 returned to sender due to unable to deliver.. i live about 45 mins from the 'beaten track' that driver didnt want the journey imo.. said he tried to deliver and uploaded a picture of 'our' house.. turned out to be a house in the town 45 mins away found with google earth after many hours of searching … just avoid dhl/tnt

    Reply
  6. Simple: You can't upgrade sorting centers, only build new ones! that's why it take a long time before all sorting centers have the newest technology
    Believe me if they could save money the would do it, but you can't just close an existing sorting center that did not yet returned the investment. Also it would really bad for the environment.
    I have the feeling you have clearly a quite simple view on things. For example 1% is not that bad and the environment cost isn't that big anyway. Those other numbers are just marketing numbers. They are trying to sell their products. Those planes fly anyway, and they are never loaded to 100% There are lot of other things that have a much bigger impact. Did you know that the biggest environmental impact comes from not understanding complex systems!!

    Reply
  7. How I would automate this is to have someone manually turn the package to face the address upward for a computer to scan the barcode or read the address and sort automatically.

    Boom. There’s your free billion dollar fix! 😅

    Reply
  8. I think the rate of error is around 3%. Why? 8% and 10% is way too much and you know that info from sellers of automated systems 🙂

    To me it's not an ecological problem, but it's a inhuman job and even the 3% rate of error is high.

    Reply
  9. Don't forget the informations about the error rates came from automatic sorting machine manufacturers, so they are probably telling you higher numbers than the real ones, because they want to sell their machines…

    Reply
  10. You'd think with GPT3 artificial intelligence that they'd be able to teach a computer to read the addresses. Computers can already read bad handwriting better than humans. AI could handle 99.99% of all parcel addresses and anything that it couldn't read could be sent out for manual checking.

    There's little point asking Royal Mail questions, they are just useless. You barely get a reply when a tracked parcel goes missing.

    Reply
  11. If Royal Mail can't disclose a sorting error rate due to "security reasons", then I guess on a real security question they would answer that they can't respond because it would endanger the life of his highness King Charles.

    Reply
  12. I am a patreon of an artist (based in the USA) who sends out stickers every month. One time my package was missent to BERMUDA. I am from BULGARIA. It was really funny and I still keep the package. If it was something urgent though I'd be really annoyed

    Reply

Leave a Comment