Come Join The Discord: http://www.discord.gg/comics-explained
Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/comicsexplained
Check Out Kang the Conqueror Part 1: https://youtu.be/mEv-IrXsnlE
Kang the Conqueror Playlist!: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9sO35KZL50wa5MGmg-_yPzZF_wIo9dz_
Kang the Conqueror is a supervillain appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics. The character is most frequently depicted as an opponent of the Avengers and the Fantastic Four.
Subscribe Here! http://bit.ly/ComicsExplainedSub
Check out Marvel & DC Full Stories! http://bit.ly/MarvelDCFullStories
GET A ROB CORPS RING HERE!
βΈ https://www.patreon.com/comicsexplained
FOLLOW ME HERE!
βΈ Twitter.com/Comicsexplained
βΈ Facebook.com/Marvelexplained
βΈ Instagram.com/Comicsexplained
#kangtheconqueror #marvelcomics #ComicsExplained #marvel #kangtheconquerorloki
ABOUT ME:
This channel was designed to assist in answering all of your questions about Marvel Comics and DC Comics in an easy to understand way.
Kang Versus Apocalypse: Kang Vol 1 Part 2 | Comics Explained
https://youtu.be/_xRAFdUNLdc
Comics Explained
https://www.youtube.com/ComicsExplained
source
Yeah but if Disney Marvel make Kang it will be a male female black & white pregnant unicorn
So Kings history doesn't matter anymore
How did he survive the comet?
Yeah speaking of Umbrella Academy, me and my wife just finished the last 3 episodes all at once this past weekend. Good, just ended in a bit of a weird way, with the wife and everything.
LOL…looking at that old comic just reminds me of when even Africans were white to the "Modern World"
I really hope Apocalypse gets his due as a BBEG in the MCU eventually
Kang's true enemy is Kang himself.
When Rob went on that tangent talking about everybody came from Kang it's a reverse flash I was waiting to hear reverse flash came from Kang. π€£
"I am: The Apocatits!"
-Apocalypse, X-Men The Animated Series, Summer 1992..
Revonna Renslayer, Moon Knight: "Khonshu gave me your name."
Khonshu: "A traveler of the name of "Richards" will arrive at a time from time to help us in our venture to drive out the false god."
Nathaniel Richards: "Uh… I think that he was talking about Reed Richards."
Apacolypse became a good guy I didn't see that coming
Baby Jesus get rid of Kathleen Kennedy and let my boy Jon Fav run Disney.
what comic book is still , explaining alpacalypse against Kang?
19:40 if I were in that position I would just test the theory of if killing him would kill me by just giving him a massive scar on my younger selfs shoulder then check myself to see if a suddenly gain a massive old fading scar on my shoulder
Damn Iβm confused
It's funny that they have the ancient Egyptians European in the comic..lol
This is some convoluted stuff.
Beyond omega level: the divine creator
13:00 so what your saying is that all of the avengers in the MCU are immortal now. Thanks Tony!
Whereβs part 6 π
Writers need to stop ruining origin stories….. Building something in their image that they didn't create is just ego building. The company should put a stop to some of the things they do. Rewriting. Cultural switching either post or pre ….. to fit what ever agenda they have going.
With alternate universes. They exist due to people making different choices. Saying every Iron Lad has to be kang goes against the whole multiverse. Time travel is a mess no matter how they do it too. You can't die because of a loop. yet, then if you had to be iron lad. you can't advance past that time loop per their own logic of everyone became kang. Killing a future kang wanna be would not effect time line. They came from the future. Easy way to insert who you want into current books to replace others. It don't have to even make sense Just say "plucked out of time". Amazing we don't see exiles show up.
Apocalypse has one if thr best origin storyes
MUST BE GREAT TO LOVE THE SOUND OF YOUR VOICE AS MUCH AS THIS GUY TALKING DOES
HeIIz yeah, this is the kinda ish that gets my deek hard…π€πΌπ€ͺπ―βοΈ
Rama tut in the new Fantastic four movie coming.
Rob, What is your exact racial makeup? You look like more like Indian/MidEastern than Sub-Saharan African. Just curious.
Whoa whoa let's slow down, ancient people were less intelligent because they believed in gods…ok. What's not going to happen is I talk about reality. What IS going to happen is I say "But Rob? Aren't "gods" an actual, tangible classification/existence in the Marvel universe? Like there's no questions of faith it's just "who's that? Oh nobody important just Thor. As a matter of fact that reminds me! Let's go before he starts actually trying to talk to us, dude is such a showoff" π³π
Edit* if anything in the marvel universe humanity is weaker for not abandoning the gods and until the age of superheroes are somewhere between pathetic and screwed, just look at how other intelligent life forms AKA aliens view Earth. It's a backwater mud bowl meanwhile Asgard is so advanced the rainbow bridge still seems like magic instead of just "beam me up Scotty" "oh and make it look pretty, got to show off when you show up" ππ ππ
Apocalypse has always been my favorite character on mcu!
If this time travel theory is true then the avengers are alive forever in the mcu bcuz they time traveled
Kang is dope… but just a little too powerful. And I love me some En Sabah Nur. I think Kang takes this but personally I pick Apocalypse.
Dude, do u know any other words besides essentially and effectively? Like Jesus christ
There are 2 coherent (logically non-contradictory) consequences of time travel; solipsism and parallel worlds.
Solipsism is the idea that the time traveler is everything and everyone. In Robert A. Heinlein's story "All You Zombies" Heinlein's protagonist creates "himself" by going back in time and arranging for a sex changed version of himself to have sex with "himself" in order to have a baby him. In the end there is only one way this could work; if the protagonist is every character in this story not just "himself". Solipsism implies that variety, difference is an illusion. There are no other souls only one soul: the self created. Creating himself by creating everyone and everything. It's an icky but "coherent" theory. Coherent in the sense of mathematics. Mathematics is self-coherent: it is based on unprovable premises. In other words there are built in assumptions that can never be proven or verified, like Euclid's assertion that lines are made out of points. Points and lines don't exist outside of paper drawings. You cannot find them under a microscope, through a telescope, crossing the street; they are as tangible as Harry Potter or Bugs Bunny. They are assertions posing as facts: fake news, fiction. As a matter of coherency they make perfect sense, provided you believe in the premises. In the case of Euclid you believe there are things called points and that, somehow?, individual points join together to make lines. It is logical, it doesn't contradict itself, but it is non-empirical: it cannot be physically corroborated by the senses. Oh you can draw a line and a point, but have you ever seen a point or a series of points join together to make a line, actually seen it without it being drawn or depicted by someone else? If everyone believes it, like mass hysteria, is it real? Now ask yourself have you ever seen the number 2 or the letter A walking down the street? How about God? Jesus? George Washington? Your mom and dad? Mom and dad are real, just as real as George or Jesus because they can be independently corroborated – witnessed (not drawn) by others through the senses. When it comes to history: George and Jesus, it can get murky because the evidence of existence no longer relies on the actual people just on their legacies or, nowadays, dna. Math too has a legacy, so does Bugs, so do fairy tales and Aesop's fables. The real question of reality is why should we continue propagating the legacy? Unlike the sun π or the earth π do they provide continuous heat, light or sustenance? Or is their reality tied to the sustenance of the values they provide, values other than the law of the jungle?
As for parallel worlds good primers are Roger Zelazny's "9 princes in Amber" and Piers Anthony's "Split Infinity". Their major premise? That we can shift lanes, like in a highway, from one universe to another. But isn't that what consciousness already does? According to the writers a pretext is required. A pretext as plausible as any premise of math or figure of history or character of fiction. Plausible, but is it real?
According to apocalypse's origin comic series, Kang is partially responsible for creating the apocalypse we all know and love.
I take it that the tragedy of Kang is that despite his machinations and how far ahead he thinks or how many time he tries for the perfect plan, it always is just going to fail.
Kang's origins is kind of like a paradox, reminds me of a movie i saw awhile back.. a time traveler is his own mother And father.. And a terrorist, that spurred the time travelling in the first place.
Kang vs Franklin Richards!
Over powered is lame. Thor bets them all. He is Zesus. He is Hades, he is Mars. Thor is more powerful than Odin. Hercules is a one off of Zeus beating Chronos. Only Thor is Zeus, Not Hercules . Hercules would be more of a gilgamesh type or even christ Noah type. Lame story twists. The real is better.
So wth, last two minutes you talk about Apocalypse.