A Cloud City on Venus: Why Venus is a Better Choice



Got a beard? Good. I’ve got something for you: http://beardblaze.com

Simon’s Social Media:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SimonWhistler
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/simonwhistler/

Love content? Check out Simon’s other YouTube Channels:

Biographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClnDI2sdehVm1zm_LmUHsjQ
Geographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHKRfxkMTqiiv4pF99qGKIw
Warographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9h8BDcXwkhZtnqoQJ7PggA
SideProjects: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3Wn3dABlgESm8Bzn8Vamgg
Into The Shadows: https://www.youtube.com/c/IntotheShadows
TopTenz: https://www.youtube.com/user/toptenznet
Today I Found Out: https://www.youtube.com/user/TodayIFoundOut
Highlight History: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnb-VTwBHEV3gtiB9di9DZQ
Business Blaze: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYY5GWf7MHFJ6DZeHreoXgw
Casual Criminalist: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheCasualCriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZdWrz8pF6B5Y_c6Zi6pmdQ

source

40 thoughts on “A Cloud City on Venus: Why Venus is a Better Choice”

  1. You are skipping right past the Nuclear war about 13,000 years ago that reduced 2 planets down to the rubble of the Asteroid & Kuiper Belts knocking Earth off of its perpendicular "Eden" spin axis while stripping Mars of its oceans & atmosphere. Exploding Kuiper knocked Uranus completely sideways! For some strange reason, Megaprojects believes that the gravity of Venus did not capture the matter blasted off the surface of Mars, WTF? It's basic physics!

    Reply
  2. I’d take this over Mars easily. I do think though our future in space probably will be mostly in O'neil cylinders or other kinds of artificial habitats. Venus could be a good way for us to learn how to make those better too.

    Reply
  3. Resource extraction is the foundation of any colonial economy.

    While Venus' upper atmosphere is (relatively) habitable, sourcing materials from the atmosphere severely restricts what you can build with, crippling any economy you might establish there. The dense atmosphere makes long term interplanetary commerce a nightmare too, as you cannot easily use mass-drivers to facilitate trade with other colonies.

    It's an interesting option, I just don't see it having any future beyond as a science outpost. I doubt we'll ever see a self-sufficient colony there.

    I'd rather be working in the mines on Mars, than stuck with my head in the clouds on Venus.

    Reply
  4. I feel like it would be hard to get people onboard with not having a "real ground". Just psychologically there is something about touching the dirt or ground of a place after having been at sea or in the air for a long time and not getting that feeling would be a nogo for me.

    Reply
  5. that's all great but what would people go to venus for ? what kind of stuff does one get from venus that would be costlier to obtain from elsewhere ? When people talk about colonizing planets they forget that without an economic incentive no matter how habitable a planet is its pointless to go there.

    Reply
  6. Admirable concept that has some merit but then big question in the end will always be what decides if we really do it–what do you do when you get there? Mars you can readily do resource gathering even though the environment sucks while on Venus, can you do the same with the gasses there? The Cloud City in Star Wars was a gas mining complex for collecting and processing a rare fictional compound. So far, the abundant resource is sulfuric acid which isn't something we're exactly short on.

    Reply
  7. People act like parrots 🦜 just repeating , "it's a hellish" planet . Instead of thinking for themselves or actually doing they're own research . Saturn and Jupiter seem much more like "hell" ,at least Venus has a surface and besides the fact that Venus is a much better option than Mars in some variables ,. What are the elite hidding from us ?🐲👽

    Reply
  8. OOooopss, the guy who would be a school shooter was on Venus instead of earth and decided to join the local terror group of the cloud city. They blew up the damn ballooons so everyone crashed on the surface and died.

    Seriously, there are sooo many horrifying risks with living outside earth. This is like being an early adopter of new tech, but putting your life on the line, and not just large amounts of money.

    Reply
  9. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) contains water. There's your source of H2 and water. O2 for breating. Use H2 for lift gas. There are no issues with using H2 for lift gas on Venus because there is no free O2 for it to react with. It's cheap and it has double the lift capacity of helium. The nasty sulfur can be dumped overboard. I don't think we're going to worry about contaminating the surface.

    Reply

Leave a Comment