The Mad Genius Of George III: Britain's Longest Reigning King | Mad King George | Timeline



After 200 years under lock and key, all the personal papers of one of our most important monarchs are seeing the light of day for the first time. In the first documentary to gain extensive access to the Royal Archives, Robert Hardman sheds fascinating new light on George III, Britain’s longest-reigning king.

📺 It’s like Netflix for history… Sign up to History Hit, the world’s best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code ‘TIMELINE’ http://bit.ly/3a7ambu

You can find more from us on:

https://www.facebook.com/timelineWH

https://www.tiktok.com/@timelineworldhistory

https://www.instagram.com/timelineWH

This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact [email protected]

source

38 thoughts on “The Mad Genius Of George III: Britain's Longest Reigning King | Mad King George | Timeline”

  1. The lesson here is that history is not static. No coincidence that the Bowling Green statue gets a mention 2:25. The understanding of Geo III now is entirely different. He wasn’t ‘mad.’ Unfortunately the title here perpetuates this propaganda.

    The American view of Geo III is today largely still based on wartime propaganda and the writings of the dandy Jefferson.

    “I love artillery…” such a merican thing to say. French guns of course, but they don’t tell that part.

    Check out Andrew Robert’s new bio.

    Reply
  2. Gorgeous carriage was the Air Force one of its time it was meant to be bulky heavy strong and uncomfortable because the king should never allow himself to become comfortable with the state of his kingdom

    Reply
  3. Let's be clear he was never king of America. America is a set of continents. He ruled some colonies. A small fraction of what the United States became. The U.S.A. isn't only place that refers to themselves as American. It became short hand for the U.S. simply for being in the title but a lot of Central and Southern Americans do get upset and for a good reason because they are Americans living in America just not the United States part.

    Reply
  4. If it was not porphyria(which can make a sufferer go crazy)then explain how it is several of his descendants were diagnosed with this & it was believed a few of his ancestors were also afflicted with it!

    Reply
  5. Profound indeed. I saw the movie several times and had somewhat of a loyal and highly inquisitive nature that has endured throughout my later life. Thank you with the highest esteem for this presentation & moreover, thank you dear Elizabeth II for making these archives available. Now I can finally acquire much knowledge before I pass. Sincerely I remain, Sentebey at 80 years old in USA.

    Reply
  6. He lost the greatest colony in the world by peasant farmers no less and began the downfall of Imperial Britain and should be regarded as nothing more than a despot theres no redeeming quality or contributions that can underwrite the crimes this family and their ancestors perpetrated against their subjects and protectorates from the Caribbean to India to Africa the blood of 10's of millions of people are on their hands.

    Reply
  7. Mark Twain said something to the effect that when the mob went one way a wise man heads in the other direction. My direct ancestors (a step below the famous but rubbing shoulders on occasion) were very active loyalist with roots going back to 1638 (Queen Anne). Scared the bejesus out of the old Dutch traitors & recent New England Salem 'Saints' in upstate NY province (in Stillwater, essentially founded by my ancestors after the French defeat in 1763) but were ultimately defeated by our revolting cousins thanks only to the intervention of the French we had all struggled against desperately for the last 200 years and a traitorous radical 'wig' party in London much like the 'Dems' of DC of today ! It was the ultimate betrayal of unity in the Anglo World at the time !
    180,000 other Colonials, long & short bred, true patriots and tame conservatives, also left for other parts of the common Empire and flourished while Thomas Jefferson (a very wise man) tamed and mythologized the American creation myth
    God save Good King George, all of his descendants and may his enemies be forever confounded.
    Canadian Loyalist – a rare dying breed well worthy of conservation.

    Reply
  8. He seems like a nice guy, who tried his best. Too bad that crooked politicians ruined his plans.
    On a funny note, just think king George III, cut the cheese in that Royal carriage! And that tradition has continued until today! I can see queen Charlotte just gasping for air wanting out!

    Reply
  9. Ya know if that stuck up pig would have just given the colonies home rule like they asked for. Then give them representation in parliament.
    America would still be apart of the empire and the Anglo Empire would still exist today.

    Reply
  10. I never realized just how pathetic still having a monarchy was until I heard and saw the guy calling that old lady your majesty. Especially when the king a couple hundred years ago was aware of its absurdity.

    Reply
  11. I feel like the United States' disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan was payback for our taking a dump all over KG3. When you think about it, the reasons for the taxes waged against us was due to a costly war, which was meant to protect us. If he had taxed people on the mainland to pay for the French and Indian War, then they would have revolted, so he was kind of damned either way. And the US was lucky that the French intervened with their troops and especially with their Navy, because we didn't even have a navy! People here try and make it all about George Washington, no doubt he was courageous and had brass balls, but he did not have the military prowess and tactical precision of the British Generals, we were seriously up a creek without a paddle, until those Frenchies came and saved the day. Honestly, were it not for the French, we would still be part of England today.

    Reply
  12. Thomas Paine – alive at the time, unlike you or me, or any of the monarchy worshipers above, described George's character as "that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man…" But I guess whoever creates the propaganda gets to paint the subject any way they like…

    Reply

Leave a Comment