SpaceX Has a BIG New Problem With Starship



Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: https://www.thespacerace.news/subscribe

Last Video: What Happened When The Soviets Launched A Giant Mirror Into Space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujWnpB5Wm5E&ab_channel=TheSpaceRace

β–ΊSign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: https://www.thespacerace.news/subscribe
β–ΊBecome a member today: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeMcDx6-rOq_RlKSPehk2tQ/join
β–ΊSupport the channel by purchasing from our merch store: https://shop.theteslaspace.com/
β–Ί Join Our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/jeZgzNUcBw
β–Ί Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thespacerace
β–Ί X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSpaceRaceYT
β–Ί Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheTeslaSpace

Mars Colonization News and Updates
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0SQRy0-pZBjdnBaU6JsWr4B

SpaceX News and Updates: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0QGbrNimSIWKYeyQ7JjENhE

The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans’ mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race… you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!

β–Ί Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: https://www.theteslaspace.com

Business Email: [email protected]

#Spacex #Space #Mars

source

49 thoughts on “SpaceX Has a BIG New Problem With Starship”

  1. In a strange way I'm glad Elon has taken off his sheepskin coat and unveiled the political wolf within.
    This has allowed me to remove my SpaceX/Tesla tinted glasses that I've always worn.
    There're two sides to every story and Elon is NOT helping SpaceX's story.

    Reply
  2. Tbh SpaceX promises life multi planetary asap so local ecology is a « minorΒ Β» factor for a huge potential goal for life spread in the universe. It’s not as if SpaceX is polluting more than heavy industries and uses dangerous chemicals/metals anyway, the mercury dose is clearly wrong

    Reply
  3. How about letting billionairs pay more taxes so that agencies can employ/incorporate more staff so that investigations and planing dont take as long? Its a fact that most goverment agencies worldwide are overworked and its funny how neoliberals always construct friend-foe narratives and blame the collective attempt to achieve more safety, transparency and fairness (buerocracy) on every occasion, especially when it doesnt go according to their fantasies, instead of just asking how they can support the process of figuring everything out. I guess you either believe in pluralism or you dont. I love space exploration but I m sick of this ego mentality. With this culture they wont survive one day in deep space, because there is no one they could blame when they f**ked up. There you just die, but then again its not the people that drive these narrative that die but those who cant afford to disagree.

    Reply
  4. Musk on Mars – Space Unicorns

    Using statements issued by Elon Musk I have calculated the viability of his Mars colonization project. Strap in, the G-forces will be very high.

    Musk admitted that 1 million tons of material must be sent to Mars in advance of humans to supply the components for safe habitat.

    That requires 10,000 successful launches and subsequent descents of Starship to the selected habitat area on Mars (100 ton payload per Starship claimed by Musk).

    In addition, Musk stated it will take 6 more Starships for every Mars bound vehicle to refuel those Mars bound Starships for the actual Mars journey. That's 60,000 additional Starship launches, allowing that there are no failures.

    This gives us 7 launches for every Mars bound vehicle. So in reality, at one launch per day (wildly optimistic = delusional, but let's go with it) it will take 7 days per Mars bound vehicle. That now totals 191 years to complete material transfer.

    1) What will happen to the first material that lands after 191 years while it sits waiting for the final structural parts to be landed?

    2) Who will finance each Starship?

    3) Who will finance the cargo?

    4) Who will finance the fuel mass needed to make the journey?

    5) What can be done at the Mars site if material is damaged?

    6) During the 191 years will there continue to be a viable SpaceX factory?

    7) How many Starship launches will fail during the program to put material on Mars.

    8) How many Starships will crash during the landing phase on Mars?

    These are the most basic problems. There are countless questions for the logistics to get started, keep it operational and do the costly program maintenance.

    Reply
  5. I love watching Spacex progress. However there is a saying β€œDon’t make your lack of planning my emergency”. Before the company complains they should have all their homework done and submitted well before their desired dates.

    Reply
  6. La course au plus CON? il faut penser à préserver la Terre avant de jouer les idiots dans l'espace! Mars sera pour les riches et non une avancé scientifique! pour y parvenir proprement il faut que le projet soit MONDIAL et public, le petit Musk est juste un chercheur d'or des temps moderne! il laisse de la pollution après chaque BOOM , il gaspille des ressources qui manqueront très vite, il fait penser à un gosse de riche qui fait joujou avec des nouveaux jouets, il se fait plaisir? ok mais pas sur notre dos et encore moins sur le dos de la planète et notre qualité de vie.

    Reply
  7. The more I think about it, the typo more than likely occured at the FAA because SpaceX would do everything on computers and likely transmit their applications/correspondence electronically to obtain a timestamp. Sabotage?

    Reply
  8. As I see it, federal and state agencies are doing their job for what the taxpayers are paying them. Turning a blind eye to SpaceX would be a dereliction of duty (something that FAA did once before with Boeing, at the cost of 350 lives; they learned from that.)

    Reply
  9. But flying the same profile is NOT what SpaceX wants to do over and over, what are you talking about? They are trying to rapidly innovate, they've been saying that since before starship existed my dude! How do you have the same profile flight after flight if you're rapidly innovating?!

    Reply
  10. Thank you so much for some fair, objective and detailed reporting on the issue. Unlike so many SpaceX sycophant channels. For the fanboys, Elon has had years to develop a good relationship with the regulators and act in good faith. Your precious Starship is late because of Elon's continual contempt and tardiness.

    Reply
  11. I believe Musk is kinda being politically targeted here because of who he's backing up this election. Think about it. Vote Blue and you're going to keep getting more reds in relation to Starship progressing. Meanwhile, China….

    Reply
  12. I'd rather have drinkable water than a fast track for spacex. Since corporations only care about money, you can't trust them to make sure they aren't damaging our environment. So it's a necessary evil to have some entity to make sure it isn't a problem. Since companies can and do lie, the regulators have to act like private detectives to make sure the company isn't hiding anything. That's what takes so long. From the company perspective it's great to complain about red tape. From a citizen of earth, I'd complain that if companies didn't lie and actually cared about our environment, it wouldn't be necessary.

    Reply

Leave a Comment