Maybe She'll Remember to Turn on Her Lights Next Time



A woman is pulled over for no lights, not wearing a seatbelt, and talking on the phone in Crawford County, Wisconsin. The stop leads to a K9 alerting to possible drugs in the truck followed by a search on her vehicle.
#police #wisconsin #desoto #k9

Subscribe for more from BodyCam Raw Wisconsin:

Find and watch full episodes on our site:
https://www.youtube.com/@bodycamrawwisconsin

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089390438021

Twitter – https://www.instagram.com/bodycamrawwisconsin/

E-mail – [email protected]

source

41 thoughts on “Maybe She'll Remember to Turn on Her Lights Next Time”

  1. No lady you’re right, cops aren’t the boss of you, drugs and drinks are. Reality based living is one of the first things to go once you become drug dependent. Vids like this act as warnings to the rest of us.

    Reply
  2. I'm 95% sure the K9 did not alert to drugs like the description & the officer says in the video. The reason I say that is due to what is said at 8:25 through 8:28. The officer whose body cam we are viewing at that time tells the other officer to look at all the residue in the bag & the other officer says, "I wish she would've got out & laid down." I am all but certain he is referring to the dog because the dog didn't hit on anything the first trip around the vehicle & then they did a 2nd one which cut off before it was finished. Plus the officer who was guiding the dog is not the same officer whose body cam we are viewing through at the time stamp I mentioned. During the time stamp I mentioned the body camera is X81638025 whereas the K9 officers body cam is X81053652 & I only saw 2 officers in the footage.

    I don't think it will necessarily matter in this case depending on what normally happens in Wisconsin due to no insurance on vehicle, i.e. whether or not they are allowed to tow it because of the lack of insurance. If the sole cause allowing them to search it was because of a K9 hit on it, then any remotely competent lawyer should be able to get at least the drug charges dismissed. On a side note it also tells me they knew she was going to be driving there at that time & they intended to try & pull her over to get cause to search the vehicle [they knew she was dealing.] It also explains how they just so happened to have a 2nd officer who was a K9 officer at the stop as well.

    Reply
  3. Has there ever been a time when the dog didn't alert…cops are so corrupt it's pathetic…cops think because they pull you over for some BS traffic infraction that they have the right to search your car…..when you say no it pisses them off so then it's the ole "dog alerted" BS so they can violate your rights….it takes a special kind of low life to want to harass and cage people daily.

    Reply
  4. She got a pretty stiff penalty especially in comparison to the drunk with no license where charges too often are dropped. Why is drug paraphenalia legally worse than driving drunk?

    Reply
  5. She’s still a human being and she’s someone’s family. She’s got a problem. A problem introduced to this country by our own. Instead of help, they’ll add to her problems with, fines, fines and more fines. They’ll tow her truck and charge her for that too. She’ll come out of jail with more court costs and fines and won’t be able to pay them. $1,450 to someone like her, is like $10,000. She’ll receive no help and be back on the streets to repeat this process over and again until, she smokes her brains out or, someone smokes them out for her… It’s sad that we’ve come to this as a country and the worst part is, no one gives two shits about this woman… don’t believe me, just read some of the comments made… ✌️… as you were…

    Reply
  6. In the history of dog search’s ….a dog handler will always have a trigger word for the hit ‘’ in this case she was a loser , but if a dog false flags they say ther musta been “ at some time drugs in the vehicle….but won’t they won’t tell you is the profile of the dogs true ability for contraband or human search ….dogs are not proficient, law enforcement needs them to trigger the search lawfully or not , it’s really quite a shame but it’s reality

    Reply
  7. That Sentence is a freaking sham…30 days in Jail and a Fine????
    Unbelievable and Unacceptable.
    This is in no way ANY TYPE OF DETERRENT TO ANYONE.
    We must have Sentencing Guidelines Reform in order to make a difference.

    Reply
  8. Does not have insurance because it is to expensive. My luck she is the type that would hit me and my insurance would have to pay. If you can't afford to pay for it then don't drive. I don't understand why some people think they can do whatever they want but others have to follow the rules.

    Reply

Leave a Comment