4 Player FACTION WAR | Tzeentch, Cathay, Kislev & Beastmen | Total War Warhammer 3 Multiplayer



For Events, Tournaments & Discord Links: https://totaltavern.com/
TWW3 here to support the channel: https://www.nexus.gg/turin
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TurinRTS
Support the stream: https://streamlabs.com/turin
https://www.patreon.com/Turin
Channel Sponsors: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNDJiDFJWaiKktyUBmVzGYA/join
#Warhammer #totalwar #Turin

source

40 thoughts on “4 Player FACTION WAR | Tzeentch, Cathay, Kislev & Beastmen | Total War Warhammer 3 Multiplayer”

  1. Head canon on the Tzeench vs beast man fight is that Kairos was marching around with an over half beast man army, hence all the Tzaangors, but then Morghur comes along and flips near all of them against Kairos and a battle ensues.

    Reply
  2. I do understand that it's not topic of the video but what is multiplayer community opinion on dlc price here? Because for me it's strange hearing nothing from the Turin about it when the topic shaked the whole community

    Reply
  3. Shocker that the single entity units, the drum being niche and the lions being just plain bad. 2000% exactly what I expected. What a damn waste. The Crowmen is the only good unit. Well, I won't buy the DLC anyway but if CA wasn't up in their own asses I would have been very upset at the few unit choices, since I would have bought it. But CA sucks.

    Even though I won't be enjoying CA's poor products and services anymore, I can at least enjoy our sweet haggard Turin.

    Reply
  4. Is it me or Kieslev old units and their new units don't look like they supposed to be in the same roster? For me it would be more logical if they were different race. Like why would baba Yaga have access to the ice court, patriarchs or tzar guard. It's just seems off to me

    Reply
  5. Cathay units are so durable already, the drum seems like it could get a bit nuts providing the attack bonus. Now all of a sudden you halberds now have enough MA to trade into enemy armored infantry as well as butchering large targets. They will be so efficient in the melee grind.

    Reply
  6. I feel like Tzaangors literally throw any other infantry choice for Beastmen into a can. Bestigors were not great anyway (unless some there were some buffs in this patch), normal gors are simply not outclassed now, ungors…well, if you want a beasttide build i guess.
    Vortex Beast seems a bit too good. Oh well, classic CA with new shiny toys. Ah yes, Kugath on Tzeench roster is sure fun, good luck melee factions. Especially in land battles.
    Jet/Jade Lions having actuall morale is kinda silly. At least make them crumble or just make them outright unbrekable. Jade Dragon execution thingy seems a bit to good, maybe stop at 15/10% hp.
    Kislevs seems really good and actually balanced.
    But again, just my silly two cents.

    Reply
  7. May as well delete grail knights from MP, Cost increase was correct, the infantry interaction was unique and had a cool place in the meta, even if a bit OP (which the cost addresses). Now it's back to questing knights and below all the time. I don't think I saw grail knights ever carry a game in the past 2 weeks of tournies as most the games I seem to remember at most they payed for themselves or maybe a bit more at best, and a lot they just got killed immediately and got 500g value.

    I'm sure the 5 armoured kossar spam meta we're in is way more fun and dynamic… 😐 Sorry for the rant, it just kind of tilts me how we had something unique but then everyone hates it when it was only problematic for like, the first week it was released then everyone adapted (like what happens in a meta).

    Reply
  8. I'm surprised beastmen didn't also get things in the woods, if they got both Tzaangors and Elemental of Beasts. I as a hardcore beastman fan will be very very happy come the next DLCs when all the other monogod beastmen units and various chaos beasts inevitably get added to their roster.

    Reply
  9. Hey now cheeseability with SE's isnt the main thing campaign players like in regards to new units, its moreso what teir buildings the units require to recruit and how many turns they take to recruit, particularly when compared with other units

    Reply
  10. Your pricing idea for the changeling is definitely better than what we have now but simply adding a fee on top of the copied lord will make most caster lords unviable still because you are forced to take all spells and abilities of the lord you changed into.

    Reply
  11. Watching that was a lot of fun! One thing I didn’t realize is it seems like tzeentchs army ability doesn’t give points in ffa, when you nailed those tzar guard your points didn’t go up at all

    Reply
  12. @Turin the blue skinned avian featured tzaangors are from Age of Sigmar not Warhammer fantasy. These tzaangors are from an older edition of Warhammer fantasy, I don't remember which edition specifically but Nathan from the great book of grudges could tell you.

    Also any chance for like a non sfo modded tournament. Personally I think OvN lost Factions with mixus stuff would be really cool. As OvN lost Factions has Amazon's, Albion, fimir, dread king legions, as well as the southern realms and a few other cool things. Youd see some pretty cool different builds I'm sure. In total war Warhammer 2 it also added Chaos deamons and chaos dwarfs.

    Reply

Leave a Comment