1966: LONDON to MANCHESTER as FAST as POSSIBLE | Tomorrow's World | Retro Transport | BBC Archive



In a world where manned spaceflight has been accomplished, and where Britain and France are on the cusp of delivering supersonic commercial air travel, Tomorrow’s World comes down to earth, to consider the efficiency of day-to-day public transport in Britain.

Producer Paul Ferris travels from his Putney home in London to the BBC Dickenson Road Studios in Manchester – on foot, bus, underground and overground train and plane – to see if England has a public transport system fit for the space age. How fast can he make the trip?

Clip taken from Tomorrow’s World, originally broadcast on BBC One, 6 January, 2013.

You have now entered the BBC Archive, a time machine that will transport you back to the golden age of TV to educate, entertain and enlighten you with classic clips from the BBC vaults.

Make sure you subscribe so that you never miss a single stop on our amazing journey through the BBC Archive – https://www.youtube.com/c/BBCArchive?sub_confirmation=1

You can also dive into plenty more BBC Archive on our website – https://www.bbc.co.uk/archive

source

48 thoughts on “1966: LONDON to MANCHESTER as FAST as POSSIBLE | Tomorrow's World | Retro Transport | BBC Archive”

  1. What a pillock 😂😂😂😂 that walk to the station could have been done down the backroads and even across the rail bridge in 10 minutes. And why would you go underground into the fetid miasma when you could just have awaited the next District train at Earls Court. Complaining about space on a bus before paying to wedge into a flying tin-can? Somebody needs to give him a good slap, a cup of tea and a chance to get over himself

    Reply
  2. "Putney Bridge, which is famous for its traffic jams" – well nothing at all changed there then. Really puts the incessant whining and whinging on Nextdoor and similar places into perspective – it was literally the same situation 60 years ago.

    Reply
  3. From the Wikipedia article on WCML:
    A new set of high-speed long-distance services was introduced in 1966, launching British Rail's highly successful "Inter-City" brand[25] (the hyphen was later dropped) and offering journey times as London to Birmingham in 1 hour 35 minutes, and London to Manchester or Liverpool in 2 hours 40 minutes (and even 2 hours 30 minutes for the twice-daily Manchester Pullman).

    Reply
  4. Ah yes the West London air terminal , I remember travelling to that in 1970 to go to Heathrow to catch a plane to Rome. After 1977 ( I think) when the Piccadilly line was extended to Heathrow it then became a Sainsbury supermarket, until I believe it was redeveloped.

    Reply
  5. "… it slowly dawned upon me that travelling by public transport meant that I would have to use different kinds of transport and travel with the public. The unalloyed horror of this situation was enough to make all my hair fall out…."

    Reply
  6. I think that if someone fell into a coma in an international airport in 1966 and then woke up today, they wouldn't see a lot of difference. The design of major airport buildings – their architecture, their furnishings and the typefaces and graphics of displays had been firmly established by 1966. They would, of course, be intrigued by the information technology and irritated by the time it now takes to get from the inside of the terminal building to the inside of the plane. Beyond the way you pay and the way information about your journey is communicated to you, the world of 1966 looks remarkably like today. Yet imagine how different 1966 was from 1907 – or for that matter, how different 1907 was from 1848!

    Reply
  7. What a ridiculous and pointless palaver! London Euston to Manchester Piccadilly, 3 hours in 1966. And that’s city centre to city centre without all the poncing about getting to and from airports in the outskirts.

    Reply
  8. I love all the newspapers and books. We've always been "antisocial" on public transport!

    I think the main takeaway from this video is the central London bus terminal for the airport was not a good idea even if you lived only a couple of miles away. The direct trains to Heathrow, instead of relying on the urban infrastructure to take you to the centre, seem much more sensible.

    I'd always read that the central air terminal was discontinued mainly due to traffic jams delaying the takeoff of certain flights, as the passengers were already "checked in". And I'm sure that was the straw which broke the camel's back. But it seems like it was all just a bit of a faff even when it worked well, for not much gain — seemingly less time waiting in the central terminal than getting to it!

    Reply

Leave a Comment