$1500 Meta Quest Pro Hands-On: Mixed Reality, Face Tracking, and More



Meta Quest Pro is Facebook’s latest VR/AR Headset. We tried it during a rare visit to Meta’s research labs and it feels transformed.

Read more on CNET:https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/meta-quest-pro-hands-on-a-1500-leap-toward-the-future-of-mixed-reality/

Subscribe to CNET: https://www.youtube.com/user/CNETTV
Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉 https://bit.ly/3lO7sOU
Follow us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@cnetdotcom
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cnet/
Follow us on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/cnet
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cnet

source

50 thoughts on “$1500 Meta Quest Pro Hands-On: Mixed Reality, Face Tracking, and More”

  1. The main thing is that we need a mixed reality game where we are boarding up our windows and doors to protect our living room from a zombie apocalypse. How awesome would that be to go to your friends house and help them defend there place.

    If the price gets to around 300 marks I can see that being the ps6 and xbanana.

    Reply
  2. So you have not shown any actual footage you made by yourself through Quest Pro. You used the same videos, other reviewers did. Were you prohibited from recording your own content? This makes me concerned.

    Reply
  3. Don't know where this is headed or which company will win, but VR will dominate society. Once they jack up the resolution to resemble real life, people will enjoy VR more than real life.

    Reply
  4. A face-tracking ad-machine… oof. It’s not really about where it’s at right now, but where it’s going. You’ve got one company doing most of this, and it’s spells out a dangerous amount of control.

    Reply
  5. and then the instant they release a new system they pull all replacement parts and controllers from the market for the one you just bought , and leave your headset to rot after the controller starts drifting and you cant replace it

    scumbag company , hardly worth spending that much money on

    Reply
  6. it would be greater if the controller were gloves or as sensors built into the eyewear, and not hand-held devices. the idea is to enable vr eyewear to be worn out and about in an ordinary life setting. your hands would be free and the vr eyewear would streamline across the eyes like a glass band or perhaps just a lens.

    Reply
  7. Reality is better – Alternatively, get an empty cereal packet but two eye holes in it, then put it on your head, and you have Very Real (VR) Ality. Convincingly looks like the real world through the eye holes and doesn’t need power/batteries or have awkward cables either. I’m not sure if to call it ‘Shock-ulus’ (because of the very low price), ‘Virtua-Goggles’ (because it is fitted with an anti-dizziness device in the cardboard) or ‘Betta’ (because it comes with more interactive features than the rivals). Anyone interested? My kids can make them in minutes. Just let me know, and I’ll send you the blueprints free of charge.

    Reply
  8. CNET still hasn't reviewed the current crop of AR glasses from smaller companies, and instead focuses all their attention on their corporate overlords Apple and Meta. Real trustworthy people we're dealing with here.

    Reply
  9. everyone owns a $1000 dollar iphone and gladly buys a new one every two years. $1500 isn't bad, META just has to get mass adoption by showing people how much better their life would be with AR, plus it would basically have a built gaming system, social media stuff, and business applications. I think people that don't think this is a very good piece of tech for the future are really missing the bubble.

    Reply

Leave a Comment