I tried 'Batman: Arkham Origins' 9 Years Later



đŸ’„ALL MY LINKS: https://linktr.ee/LukeStephens
—
Batman: Arkham Origins is a 2013 action-adventure game developed by WB Games Montréal and published by Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment. Based on the DC Comics superhero Batman, it is the follow-up to the 2011 video game Batman: Arkham City and is the third main installment in the Batman: Arkham series.
—

A Critique of the Worst Batman Arkham Game – Luke Stephens
https://youtu.be/8HX2ZIIwZZ8

—-
Subscribe and I’ll be your bestest friend!
#batman #arkhamorigins #lukestephens

source

46 thoughts on “I tried 'Batman: Arkham Origins' 9 Years Later”

  1. Ooo, I'll definitely be watching this one a bit later (doing my own Christmas run of the game atm, and also recording it). It's my favorite game in the series after City, and I would still rather they do a direct sequel to this one rather than anything they tried with Gotham Knights.

    Reply
  2. I have been wondering if, "Gotham Knights," is in this same universe as, "Arkham Origins?" I experienced this title on an Xbox 360. I bet it runs great on your rig, Luke! Happy Holidays!đŸ€˜

    Reply
  3. Well, every Arkham game is known for a strength. Asylum is known for it's atmosphere and horror. City is known for it's story. Knight is known for it's polished combat. And Origins is known for it's boss battles. That's what this Arkham had going for it that no other Arkham game leaned into. It just has the best boss fights in all of the games. And it probably has the best trailers that went with these games. That Bruce growing up trailer is probably the best marketing I've seen in Batman anything.

    One thing that needs to be mentioned is Gotham itself. Gotham is a character in all these games and this Gotham is the most boring Gotham in the series. All I think of when I try to remember this game is going from Arkham City, a neon lit city and although dilapidated and in ruins, still looks lively and has character, – to the monochrome drabness of dead streets in Arkham Origins, unlived buildings, and souless structures in areas that couldn't look less appealing to explore. Their contribution to the Arkham map should've been an indication just how boring they would make all of Gotham in Gotham Knights. That is my biggest issue with this game. It's such a crap map that you don't want to cross that goddamn bridge when it comes to it.

    Reply
  4. This game needs a remaster. It smokes Rocksteady's Arkham in boss fights and cutscenes. The story is nice, too. It's criminally underrated, and you should play it if you're a fan of Batman, action games, or just plain fun.

    Reply
  5. the reason why the city looked weird was because this version of gotham was a lot more younger as well as the batman. The developers took all the same buildings and did modify them to look more different to Arkham City and Arkham Knight. To me i believe this to be a smart idea since it’s literally like batman fighting bad guys who affect the city, which causes it to look younger.

    Reply
  6. Batman Arkham Origins NEEDS a remaster,
    It had the best story, best feel (christmas) and it was dark and menacing.
    The only reason why people didn't like it and they KNOW it is because it's side missions weren't that great and there was no riddles trophies

    Reply
  7. I just played Arkham Asylum & City for the first time the past few weeks (I had only played Knight when it came out for some reason) and decided to buy this game. I didn't even know it took place during Christmas and I beat it on Christmas night, it was a perfect time to play it.

    Reply
  8. This is what I wish Arkham Knight was, narrative & performance driven. Conroy's Batman was very over the top & aggressive, and left no room for moments of subtlety & humanity like there are in Arkham Origins, u got to see Bruce Wayne overwhelmed and in over his head, stressed & angry. You see a man trying to be something more for his City. In Arkham Knight Batman, is pretty much the same throughout the whole game, even though it's a lot of fun I wasn't emotionally invested at all

    Reply

Leave a Comment