LIVE from the University of Cincinnati (Cincinnati, OH) – IDHEFTBAA



Does truth exist? Does God exist? Are miracles possible? Is the New Testament True? Find out how the scientific, archeological, and historical evidence points to YES in this LIVE presentation delivered at the University of Cincinnati (Probasco Auditorium) in Cincinnati, OH on 11/2.

⏱ 𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗦/𝗦𝗘𝗚𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗦 ⏱
00:00 – Intro
5:30 – Presentation
12:09 – Does Truth Exist?
36:53 – Does God Exist?
1:22:44 – Are Miracles Possible?
1:30:06 – Is The New Testament True?
1:57:49 – Are there other proofs for the universe being created?
2:01:01 – What is “the age of accountability”?
2:02:10 – Can an “age of accountability” exist if we have a sin nature?
2:05:04 – How could a just God allow natural evil to happen?
2:09:07 – People give their lives for false religions or cults. Does this mean the apostles could have died for a lie as well?
2:13:05 – Is it plausible that the apostles made up the New Testament?
2:15:00 – What is “personhood”? Is consciousness the same as personhood?
2:16:54 – Is legislating morality Christian Nationalism?
2:18:59 – How can I be bolder and stand up for my beliefs better?
2:22:46 – How can God be just if He reveals himself to some and not to others?
2:25:29 – Can evolution and the Bible coexist if our faith is in the resurrection?
2:31:31 – Do bad deeds or unbelief in Christ send you to Hell?
2:32:59 – Is it fair for God to condemn people to Hell if they didn’t consent to being created?
2:34:47 – Can you replace objective morality with human flourishing as the standard for what’s good?
2:38:46 – What does it mean to blaspheme the Holy Spirit? Is it really an unforgivable sin?
2:40:06 – Why doesn’t God intervene when babies dies, especially if they’re innocent?
2:44:55 – Can God really be just He’s allowing innocent babies to die?
2:46:20 – What are some strategies for sharing your faith with a friend?
2:48:19 – Is the Gospel meant exclusively for human beings?

source

20 thoughts on “LIVE from the University of Cincinnati (Cincinnati, OH) – IDHEFTBAA”

  1. Around 02:38:00 Chris asked the question, "Is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit unforgivable"? (Mark 3:22-30) I believe there are 2 answers. For those that are living today that reject Christ are essentially committing blasphemy against the Holy Spirit which is unforgivable. That was Frank's answer. The second answer is only applicable for those that were living at the time Christ was preaching. The Pharisees said that Jesus was performing miracles through the power of Satan and not the Holy Spirit. Jesus replied to the Pharisees that what you said was an unforgivable sin. In other words, the Pharisees had concluded that Jesus was performing miracles by an unclean spirt. So actually, both answers are true I believe.

    Reply
  2. "Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: by whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God." Romans 5:1‭-‬2

    Reply
  3. This guy does a lot of talking for someone who doesn't have much to say.
    Spends a half hour trying to explain what truth is ( like it's such a complicated concept) then tries to say the bible is true because it says it's true, and you need faith. This is not how you find truth folks.

    Reply
  4. 👊 always good this I know Atheists hate it but they are always are so angry 😡 that people still
    Believe in God with facts they denied all things that support Faith in God. But great for all who follow the evidence of thought on all sides of the debate on how life came to be. I don’t think God can be Proved or Disproven to someone who doesn’t want to believe. Given its so important if God is rule to be saved than not to find out after the soul has left the body that its is rule. No it’s not about being Scared of death ☠️ it’s about if it’s real it’s best to believe in what’s rule. Thank God we can not see our soul as the way mankind have kill one another in history i believe God has not given Mankind the ability to see or hurt the the soul.

    Reply
  5. I don't understand the title. Isn't Christianity based entirely on faith in lue of any evidence? Why would something else even if there was also no evidence for it require more faith? Wouldn't it at least be equal in terms of the faith required? hahaha

    Reply
  6. The context of the unforgivable sin is Christ speaking to the Pharisees who are seeing His miracles( knowing it is from God) as Nicodemus states, and then accrediting it to Satan. Plaspheming the Holy Spirit. Those have committed the unforgivable sin. Those who witnessed with their own eyes and ears the Son of God, and give credit to satan

    Reply
  7. Can anything good come from an innocent person dying? Ask anyone who went to heaven. Ask Jesus. Everyone has a ticket to heaven because an innocent man died.

    It's up to you to raise your hand and claim it.

    Reply
  8. Love these q and a's frank always shows how crazy this whole concept is when he is off the fly.

    The evolution question left him confused.

    But also i never understand why god can kill anyone he wants? Like why cant we think that god is a tyrant even if he can kill whoever he wants? That doesnt make sense.

    Also everytime palestine comes up frank shows his subjective morality. The govt of Israel is literslly killing thousands of innocent people and Frank is like thats ok…

    Reply
  9. I believe that time has always existed due to God's existence.

    By definition eternity is in fact time.

    I believe that God created space and matter (our universe) into the flow of time that exists due to his own existence and when God created space and matter (our universe) a timeline for space and matter (our universe) was created within time that exists due to God's existence.

    So, God exists within time, but he exists outside of our timeline within time.

    Reply
  10. Good question about morality vs human flourishing. I always get this one from Atheists – that we can have morality without a real objective morality existing or a God who of perfect standard. They will say that survival and flourishing is what we OUGHT to aim for, but as Frank says, why not the roaches? who says human flourishing is what others SHOULD aim for and cooperate to strive for? that's just your opinion, and some others have the opinion that only they matter and other human beings aren't really that valuable. Survival and pleasure and feeling good really has nothing to do with morality. Survival and flourishing are just brute facts, and you're inserting your opinions into the conversation when you say that we OUGHT to strive for life and flourishing. Who says? this is why It doesn't get to the heart of it because you're left thinking, well, WHY is survival the right, good way to move forward? It's simply one opinion vs another. There is no purpose to human life if there is no plan or intelligence or design. We are just brute facts and so are things like life and death.

    The interesting face is that we seem to have a sort of universal morality in our world, though. I would say that the majority of people actually strongly believe that the RIGHT and GOOD way to live is for human beings to strive for human flourishing and life. Life is good, death is bad. Pleasure is good and suffering is evil. We cry out for justice when wrong is done to innocent people. We tell others "you OUGHT not to do that". If there is no God and no objective moral good, then we have no grounds to actually say that to anyone else or even be angry about it. This is why it makes much more sense that the reason that we have this strong and deep desire within us is because God created us all with a moral compass, and that there is in fact a real standard of transcendent good and there is a REAL purpose for human beings.

    Reply

Leave a Comment