Why is there no such thing as a 7-cylinder engine?



Thanks to Bespoke Post for sponsoring this video! New subscribers get 20% off their first box of awesome — go to https://bespokepost.com/drivetribe20 and enter code DRIVETRIBE20 at checkout.

We have single cylinder engines, twins, triples, four-pots, inline fives, straight-sixes, but then we start to skip some steps. We jump to V8s, V10s and V12s, even V- or W16s. It’s a question many of you probably have never even thought to ask, but now that you’ve clicked on this video, let’s talk about it – why is there no such thing as a 7-cylinder engine?

Become a member to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChiwLDIBJrV5SxqdixMHmQA/join

Check out our merch: https://bit.ly/DTmerchYT

source

29 thoughts on “Why is there no such thing as a 7-cylinder engine?”

  1. This may be one of the best videos you've done, mate. My first car, a 1965 Ford Galaxie, had a 240 ci (3.9 l) straight six in it. That engine was one of the best ever, I just didn't appreciate it at the time. It was the fourth generation inline six that Ford made, and stayed in production until 1996.

    Reply
  2. Quick correction on the AGCO engine as someone who uses a tractor with it. Each cylinder does not have its own head, and it appears that they use an inline 3 head and an inline 4 head. Also, your comment at 12:40 about them being naturally aspirated is incorrect as basically no modern diesels in the 10 letter range are, and the AGCO has a compound turbo setup making about 40 psi on the monitor. The in-line 7 9.8 liter is governed to 2300 rpm, and makes 431 hp @ 1700, and 1,417 lb-ft @ 1500.

    Reply
  3. I did see a inline 7 diesel once.. I was in new hampshire and there was this snow plow machine, one of those tracked machines you use to smooth the snow at ski resorts, with the plow in the front and the rakes at the rear and it had in inline 7 turbodiesel. It was some strange scandanavian design. And there are slow speed inline 7 diesels used in ships.

    Reply
  4. The one question I always wondered about was:
    why are odd numbers of cylinders preferable to even numbers in radials? This question doesn’t apply to 18 cylinder radials, as they are simply two banks of 9.

    Reply

Leave a Comment