NASA discusses findings from UFO study | full video



NASA held a briefing Thursday after releasing a report by an independent group of 16 experts on efforts to track unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs. NASA formed the group last year to examine how data about UAPs, better known as UFOs, is collected across the government and private sector.

#news #nasa #uap

CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.

Subscribe to the CBS News YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/cbsnews
Watch CBS News: http://cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7c
Download the CBS News app: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Follow CBS News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cbsnews/
Like CBS News on Facebook: http://facebook.com/cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter: http://twitter.com/cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: http://cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Try Paramount+ free: https://bit.ly/2OiW1kZ

For video licensing inquiries, contact: [email protected]

source

50 thoughts on “NASA discusses findings from UFO study | full video”

  1. First off, it's Unidentified AERIAL Phenomena. Secondly and broadly, NASA's report will be a token presentation well shy of revealing anything of substance regarding the cover-up. We should all realize by now that the wall surrounding the decades-long secret UFO project and those guarding it are very serious people who are relatively immune from interrogation. No Congress or ANY investigating committee is going to manage exposing what this clandestine program is doing and hiding at all costs.

    Reply
  2. Here are some serious lies! Like this title! Ask him why the rockets are quieted down with water when no one has complained? and why are so many rockets being launched that they shoot one up every other day ? And the UFOs surrounding the launches made in the USA! They don't say USA on them, but they are put together with rivets and nuts and blots, unlike the seamless UFOs of advanced races! when you see panels under the UFO its ours!

    Reply
  3. NASA can’t identify mysterious flying objects is the only truth they said. the rest is a pack of lie. I stopped contacting NASA after they ignored my early warning of Chelyabinsk meteor and Omaumau. I gave them direction of approach their trajectory and the fact Omaumau is from outer solar system. that is when pentagon released tac tac video hopping public can give them what I did. since then I just answer Quora as you tube dose not give me access to american and European universities talk and videos due to the fact I point their errors in science. NASA do not have technology or understanding of real alien objects. their physic is over 90% wrong.

    I pay 100,000 Chinese Yuan to any one proving me wrong. Scientist are stupid and world leaders do not have the back boon, intelligence, power or the ball to order their scientist to prove me wrong and expose their lies. So currently over 90% of physic is fiction and lies continue.

    Reply
  4. "Whatever we find…we're gonna tell you."

    Okay, not exactly a put down of the subject and that head of NASA seems sincere to me. Looks like the main purpose of this conference was to just announce that they are setting up an new "office" to continue researching UFO's/UAP's and to do it "scientifically". So if you spend an hour watching this conference expecting some sort of "official disclosure", you will be disappointed.

    The setting up of a new and "open" office of UFO/UAP study sounded good until the end of the conference where those NASA scientists admitted that they didn't have and won't have access to any of the CLASSIFIED data about UFO's/UAP's that the US government has in its possession. To me, this essentially means we can expect that new study group to eventually morph into the latest version of the old Project Blue Book whose only real mission was to suppress the number of "unknown" cases they collected to the bare minimum with often ludicrous "explanations" and create the impression that, if they only had more information, those unknowns could also be quickly dismissed as nothing of extraterrestrial origin. In other words, we can expect the new NASA UFO/UAP study group to just be old wine in a new bottle that will taste just as bad to the serious civilian UFO/UAP researcher.

    Why didn't those NASA scientists have access to the classified data that the US AIR FORCE has on UFO's/UAP's? The reason, I am quite convinced, is that if they did, then this news conference would been one in which those NASA scientists, IF allowed to speak freely, would have finally admitted that, yes, SOME of those UFO's/UAP's WERE of "extraterrestrial origin" and that kind of disclosure to the American public and the rest of the world is not being allowed at this time. All it would take to blow the lid off of the US government's seventy year old cover up of this subject would be to show us a single genuine ET body (verified to be nonhuman by DNA analysis) in a freezer that was recovered from a genuine UFO/UAP crash (verified by letting us see its wreckage in some secret storage facility)!

    Well, if you are fed up with the endless delays and distractions by our government to letting you know what they've found out about UFO's/UAP's in the last seventy or so years, then, happily, you can now cut to the chase and find out exactly what that is years (and maybe even decades!) ahead of their schedule for the disclosure. Just view this short video for more information:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ci_EJENCTcI

    Also, to view what are probably some of the best GENUINE ET UFO photos in existence, see this short video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNKZhBiWFP8

    I wonder if those NASA scientists ever saw any of these photos? Probably not…they were only allowed to work with the declassified information spoon fed to them by the DOD.

    Reply
  5. @42:11 : "..you want to make data public" ….er, except WHO will lead our investigation, HOW much budget is devoted to it, which we have said in this conference we WILL not make public. Got it 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

    Reply
  6. Does NASA seem a bit barbed and annoyed with these questions? They keep repeating the 'transparency' mantra, whilst giving very vague general answers to specific questions, whilst saying they won't share specific info on budget, personel or process.

    Reply
  7. Dude in the black suit just laughs when the caller mentions Area 51 this is all a joke

    Uap instead of ufo to down the last 80 yr of the info they have lol waste of time

    Reply
  8. She had no idea who James Fox was. Having people that have no idea about the subject doesn't fill me with any confidence whatsoever. How can they do any kind of a job without such research data as of that like James Fox holds along with his experience in the field.

    Reply
  9. I dont need a time machine to go forward into the future to see these plebs on some UAP show whining about how they were given a script to follow they knew was BS. And Bill Nelson christ, d be looking in the wings for Jaime Maussan cause thats one of his isnt it.

    Reply
  10. This is pathetic. Are they not aware of the info that is available on this??? Even if their goal is to ease the general public into this concept being a reality, it's still pathetic and insulting.

    Reply
  11. I feel strongly that they will not be transparent on their findings. Blowing smoke? I love Bill Nelson, but I think he’s being naive. They won’t identify the scientists working on this so the transparency issue is already in question. They already believe that most ufo’s will be identifiable as balloons and other non anomalous findings. Will they release the info on the alien the government had in its possession? If they are really going to study this ‘scientifically’ then they should use the data already in the military’s archives, as well as the aliens they have preserved.

    Reply
  12. I actually turned this off…i felt a certain 'dis-ease' as soon as Ms Fox started speaking…independent team !! Where are the 'people' who can act 'independently' for US !! Because it's NOT this 'Team'

    Reply
  13. Did anyone attending this discussion or commenting on this video watch the congressional hearing on UFOs/UAPs?
    It's my opinion that this "sham of a discussion" is an attempt to sow seeds of confusion among the masses to get ahead of the truth with the government's ongoing 60-years-old disinformation campaign.
    The TRUTH is already known, people! And, it's been documented. There are witnesses. There are whistleblowers, about 750 of them, some working for the deep black military industrial complex.
    Hold on to your boots, folks. You're about to get your minds blown.

    Reply
  14. After watching this, my confidence and enthusiasm about NASA just took a nosedive. Bill Nelson doesn’t even understand the most important information about UFOs. (I will never use UAP again after watching this either.) The best part was saying how transparent they will be and then followed it up with refusing to name who the director of their program is. 😂

    Reply
  15. All I heard was, “give us more money.” I think Nasa should be defunded if they aren’t capable of producing or providing results. The evidence is out there and they refuse to look for it.

    Reply
  16. Why do so many white politicians speak with a southern accent?! It's like they're all being recruited from the same small town in America. That makes me suspicious of their character and intentions. Am I the only one who feels this way?

    Reply
  17. Delete that run the world president security guards and congressman and lot of the people are infiltrated by the reptilians anyway and people notice man how can we trust anyone we need some aliens to come back that gave us that deal Autumn years ago and asked the people if we want to do cuz of these Elites and presidents and congressmen don't run us people

    Reply
  18. Ben ingilizce bilmiyorum O yüzden
    Konuyla ilgili degil kendi düşüncemi aktaracam
    Made nasıl var oldu
    Bana göre şöyle
    Var denen tekilik halin ilk ikiye ayrılışı
    Mekan ve Zaman
    Peki mekan ve zaman nasıl bir şey
    Mekanla ile zamanı bir kağıdın iki yüzü gibidir
    Bir yüzü mekansa diger yüzüde zamandır
    Üç boyut olan görünüm zamanıdır digeri ise mekandır
    Yane görünen herşey zamandan kaynaklanır ve oluşur
    Diyelimki birşey karşımıza çıktı üç yönünü gördük görünen zamanın yansımasıdır
    Görünmeyen kısmı mekandır
    Diyelim ki ışık yok oldu kap karanlık oldu o zamanda hiçlik olmuş olur
    Yane işlemsizlik hareketsizlik
    Yane beynimiz sinyel almadığı için hiçlik yaşanır
    Neden miktar zamandan oluşur
    Zaman mekanda titredigi için kozmik basınç oluşur
    Şöyle
    Önce zaman titriyerek boyutlar şeklinde oluşur daha sonra sıkışarak atom şeklini alır daha sonra da elemet ve başka şekliler şeyler halini alır
    Bir örnekle zamanın nasıl heşeyi var etigini tarif etmeye çalışacağım
    Diyelimki yüz km deki bir alanda rüzgar akımı sirkülasyon yapıyor ama toz dumanı yok kuru bir yerde dönüyor
    Oraya bir çisim atsak O zaman ruzgarı görürüz
    Diyelim ki O rüzgar akımını kozmik basınçla sıkıştırdık
    Sıkıştırdıkça alan daralmsı yaşıyacak
    O yüz km alanı ve rüzgarı bir atom büyüklügüne sıkıştırdık ve milyarkaca yaptık ve bunları birleştidik ve bunlara ışık tutuk
    İşte sana kütle kazanımı
    Zaman da aynı bu örnekte gibi herşeyi oluşturuyor diye düşünüyorum
    Bu örnekteki işlemi bilgisayarda modeleştirebilirmisiniz ve beni bilgilendirebilirmisiniz
    Eger beni bilgilendirirseniz
    Bende eşya üzerine size daha büyük bir sürpriz yaparım
    Aynı anda hem varı hem yoku hemde hem varı hem yoku üç biçimi ölçümlerle ve görsel şekilde sunarım ben buna varım
    Umarım beni dikkate alırsınız

    Reply

Leave a Comment