The Jan 6 Indictment Against Trump Necessitates Putting the 2020 Election on Trial



Here’s how the new indictment against Trump necessitates putting the 2020 election on trial.

Check out my new store for the hottest conservative merch that will drive your liberal friends crazy! https://shop.dineshdsouza.com/

Dinesh D’Souza is an author and filmmaker. A graduate of Dartmouth College, he was a senior domestic policy analyst in the Reagan administration. He also served as a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

He is the author of many bestselling books, including “Illiberal Education,” “What’s So Great About Christianity,” “America: Imagine a World Without Her,” “The Roots of Obama’s Rage,” “Death of a Nation,” and “United States of Socialism.”

His documentary films “2016: Obama’s America,” “America,” “Hillary’s America,” “Death of a Nation,” and “Trump Card” are among the highest-grossing political documentaries of all time. He and his wife Debbie are also executive producers of the acclaimed feature film “Infidel.”

Want to connect with Dinesh D’Souza online for more hard-hitting analysis of current events in America? Here’s how:

Get Dinesh unfiltered, uncensored and unchained on Locals: https://dinesh.locals.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dsouzadinesh

Twitter: https://twitter.com/dineshdsouza

Rumble: https://rumble.com/dineshdsouza

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dineshjdsouza

Parler: https://parler.com/user/DineshDSouza

GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/dineshdsouza

Email: https://dineshdsouza.com/contact-us/

source

24 thoughts on “The Jan 6 Indictment Against Trump Necessitates Putting the 2020 Election on Trial”

  1. The word "certification" being included in the Constitution, means that there is more than "rubber stamping" going on. Certifying something necessitates that there be an option to reject whatever is being certified, as something which is "certified" is something that has passed a test or level of scrutiny to earn that label of "certified". There's no NEED for a ceremonial procedure, it doesn't even make sense, as there are rules pertaining to how congress can object to the electors, and how if a Senator seconds that objection, there can be a 1 hour debate or presentation or discussion regarding the objection, that the Vice President is required to attend. If the roll was ceremonial, there wouldn't be any rules laid out on how objections would go and who would take part and how long they could last, because it's a massive disruption to the "ceremony", and would serve no purpose. It only makes sense that this is a final check, a final way for Congress to stop any fraudulent actions that were taken. The bar is high to accomplish this, as a congressman and a senator are required per state, and in only an hour, they need to be able to make a case for why the electors in question are not to be counted. The writers of the Constitution would not use the word "certify" if they didn't mean CERTIFY. Now, this only makes sense for there to be a final check on everything, as your going from state to federal jurisdiction, where the states send electors, and the federal government receives them, certifies that these are the correct and lawful electors, and then counts them officially. That process makes sense. It wouldn't make sense where the state sends electors, which are being challenged and in contention, but the federal government just says "well, doesn't matter if there's any questions or anything, if they get to this point, we say they are good to go no matter what". What would be the point of even having the "Ceremony" then? Just have the electors counted and move on. So I would argue, that because the word CERTIFY is used, that the intention in the Constitution is clearly for the Vice President to have the option to send electors back, or pause the process if there is challenges.

    Reply
  2. They're so lame!! They just want to connect Trump to 1/6 while controlling all the facts, evidence, and witnesses like you said. They want to publically humiliate him and ruin his credibility! It's not going to happen!!

    Reply
  3. Alternate(?) electors IF our lawsuits are successful in the states. …maybe …sort of
    The country has long been divided into two parts : those that think a NY businessman can run it… And those who are afraid he will….

    Reply
  4. Dont forget Biden said: We have put together the largest and most inclusive FRAUD organization in the History of American Politics.
    They are doing what damage they can so the US NEVER RECOVERS.

    Reply
  5. Now the Court has to look at ALL the cases!!!!! That they refused.
    Trump placed the bait out for them and they took it!!
    ALL the evidence will now be put in to the record.

    Reply
  6. Dinesh , response required , either on air (Podcast) , or in person from you to this post … you said , >>> "it is an open Question as to whether the Vice President has only a cerimonial roll ….) <<< , Dinesh , consult S.5473 Electoral Count Reform Act – 9/27/22 , 10/18/22 , and H.R.8846 , 117th Congress … both these legislative bills were combined and put in the Omnibus bill and signed by Biden Dec. 29 , 2022 … essentially Congress changed the US Constitutional procedure as it stood on Jan.6, 2021 to "challenge the Electoral ballot counting" … read it , weep , and certain Republicans went along with stuffing it in the Omnibus !!! …

    Reply
  7. Just plain ridiculous. President Trump left the white house and pence could have said we will need an audit of all the electoral votes. But pence is chicken to go against the deep state! That's what happened and pence had documents at his home. Nothing has become of that and a vice president is not to take anything from his office. Biden took documents when he was a senator which is illegal and nothing has become of that either. Even when Biden was vp when he took documents from his office in Washington and nothing has become of that to be investigated and prosecuted like President Trump has.

    Reply
  8. They will never go back and officially scrutinize that election. The level of illigitimate damage done to this country, and the world, is off the charts. Everything this regime has done, should be considered illigitimate and immediately redacted, in a just world that is.

    Reply
  9. YES! Anytime there are “irregularities” in an election, it should be thoroughly and in great depth, investigated. Trump tried to get the Supreme Court to look at the evidence he had… would they? No…. and I’m sick to death of Democrats saying “nothing to see here”. Investigate it and let the chips fall where they may. My husband’s great grandmother who died in the 30’s – shows up on the census records every election year. Time to clean up the rolls people! The deep state is using it to cheat! The early voting drop boxes that are left unprotected…. time for those to go…. the “new election laws” just before elections… time for them to go. They plotted and schemed illegitimate Joe into office and now it’s time for all to see it.

    Reply

Leave a Comment