Could Charles block Prince Harry from passing Sussex title to Archie? | Palace Confidential Clip



Could Charles block Prince Harry from passing Sussex title to Archie? | Palace Confidential Clip.

A couple of days after the announcement from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex that their children Archie and Lilibet would be known as prince and princess, Buckingham Palace announced that Prince Edward would be promoted to the Duke of Edinburgh. The King ‘didn’t intend’ to give the title to his brother as part of his wider plans to ‘slim down the monarchy’, Eden tells our royal talkshow Palace Confidential. ‘But then, when Harry and Meghan started using the Prince and Princess titles for their children, it became clear this wasn’t going to happen and then King Charles could hardly justify not giving Prince Edward the title he’d been promised by their parents,’ he says. ‘It was a big deal and I really think that was behind it.’ By insisting that the Edinburgh title revert to the Crown when Edward dies, however, the King has shown that he has an ace up his sleeve when it comes to his son’s actions. ‘I have heard it said that part of the reason is that the King wants to stop Archie inheriting that title the Duke of Sussex. So this might be part of that, so he has now set that precedent,’ adds Eden. ‘The problem is, that he’d have to do it with all the royal dukes so he really wouldn’t want to do that to the very well respected Dukes of Gloucester and Kent.’

#PrinceHarry #MeghanMarkle #Royals #PalaceConfidential #frogmorecottage #royalfamily #Lilibet #meghan #kingcharles #Archie #PrincessLilibet #Archie

source

32 thoughts on “Could Charles block Prince Harry from passing Sussex title to Archie? | Palace Confidential Clip”

  1. Concern about the Gloucesters and Kents is understandable were dukedoms to be no longer hereditary but were they to revert to the Crown, the same as the dukedom of Edinburgh, would the King not be able to confer the titles to Gloucester's and Kent's eldest sons anyway, should he so wish? Thus the dukedom of Sussex would also not be hereditary so there would be no risk of an American becoming Duke of Sussex.

    Reply
  2. For heavens sake, please stop bashing these kids – Archie & Lilibet. They are so innocent. They are just as precious as Williams kids. KC will be remembered for his biased treatment of Archie & Lilibet. Maybe it's true that the Royals are PREJUDICE!!🤔 Their "actions" speak louder than their words. How can Will become king of people of color in the commonwealth and DO NOT accept or acknowledge his bi-racial nephew and nisce!! Shameful!!! The world is certainly watching.

    Just because they are "slightly" bi-racial, it's shameful that the Royals are not embracing them. Regardless of how you feel about their parents, they are doing well as a family. Real love has no boundaries or BIASES!!! If you can't be happy for them, then SHUT-UP.

    Reply
  3. No none working Royals should not have tittles the Sussex.s should have there titles removed immediately they don't deserve anything let them get proper jobs then they will know how entitled they were

    Reply
  4. Charles is a self absorbed creep and did not want to give the title to Edward. He just did it because of the optic of giving titles to Archie znd lillibet to buy todgers silence while denying Edward

    Reply
  5. Charles should block harkles but I am sure he will not do it, he is too weak, he is only good in taking care plants! Coronation's audience will see harkles on the balcony with Camilla's children and the crowning of Camilla as your queen!!!

    Reply
  6. Where is the DNA. What is kc thinking. He's not. Be a good king. Parliament needs to take this because they are trying to live off the British tax payer and that involves the government. It is not to take over the authority of the monarchy. They have stepped over the line.

    Reply
  7. It makes perfect sense for the Sussex title to revert to the crown. Why do American children need British Royal titles? It also makes perfect sense for the other dukedoms to stay as they are and for Edinburgh to revert back as it is a title associated with the capital of Scotland. I see no difficulty in this, they do not all need to be treated the same.

    Reply
  8. I’m beginning to think Narcissist King Charles doesn’t even deserve the throne . Should be Anne , she has served her country better. Edward is more deserving as is his son or daughter . They are better choices than Ginger muppet or Randy families.

    Reply
  9. I think the idea of slimming down the monarchy is an excellent idea, and giving the title that the Queen wanted given to Edward, but denying it being a hereditary title was a good thing to do. The world is changing and young people now will see nothing wrong in merchandising their titles – which would be very bad for the monarchy. Many people support KC3 slimming down and he is not alone – look at the entitled wails of fury from Denmark when all the princes were given other titles instead . Too much entitlement in a world where entitlement is wrong for what is an accident of birth. Let these people have jobs, live a free and ordinary life – they will be the better people for it. Someone expressed horror that an elderly supporter to the crown such as the Duke of Gloucester would now be told his title would not be hereditary ,- Charles has said for many years he would be slimming down the monarchy, this is a new age. Brief pain in the great scheme of things but the monarchy will be in a strong position to face future challenges because of Charles actions.

    Reply
  10. I am really hoping once this coronation is over we can all go back to hearing about anyone or anything else but this weak old man, his spoiled brat son and his gold digging wife. See you in June. 🙄

    Reply
  11. Hey Edward gave up his throne for the woman he loved, was given a created title as Duke and Duchess of Windsor, lived basically in exile in France( never understood how they kept their lifestyle) but the title died with then. So Harry's title can die with him also.

    Reply
  12. We don’t do royal titles in America. We fought a war for that independence. It’s interesting to see you talk about what King Charles III should or shouldn’t do. Then turn around and laugh about Harry and Meghan not wanting to live in a apartment next to William & Catherine, the Prince and Princess of Wales. After long time residents were put out to accommodate them!! Is that funny? That they moved to the states into a mansion with 16 bathrooms & pay for fluff journalism to try to appear special, I can assure you they are NOT to most Americans. Hypocrites, grifters, liars and they continue to disrespect both their own families. My entire life I was in awe of Queen Elizabeth, a strong women of character and grace. Reading the history of the British Monarchs. As governments topple you might want to show more respect to the monarchy – while you still have one. Soon it will be a one world government and then what? Will you report on the WEF and Klaus Schwab.
    KC needs to be rid of them once and for all. Let Harry keep his title – where it will do him no good. I can not wait for the coronation to happen.

    Reply

Leave a Comment