Why Hosting The World Cup Is A Bad Idea For Countries



Nov. 20 is the opening day of the much anticipated FIFA World Cup in Qatar. The country is estimated to have spent roughly $229 billion on hosting the event, making it the most expensive World Cup ever, and more than four times as costly as all tournaments combined since 1990.

But aside from the honor involved with hosting the biggest soccer tournament in the world, it could draw massive exposure to a country: an influx of tourism, the potential for foreign trade, new development and jobs. For Qatar, the tiny Gulf country needed stadiums and infrastructure and used 1.7 million workers, 90% foreign, to help get the country ready.

The question remains, will the glory and questionable short- and long-term economic impacts outweigh the debt? Many experts say no.

Produced by: Darren Geeter
Senior Managing Producer: Tala Hadavi
Graphics by: Jason Reginato, Alex Wood

Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
1:20 Getting the bid
3:10 Economic impact
5:42 Long-term risks
9:22 Qatar
10:57 Future of hosting

» Subscribe to CNBC: https://cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: https://cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision

About CNBC: From ‘Wall Street’ to ‘Main Street’ to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.

Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: https://www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: https://cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: https://cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: https://cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: https://cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC

#CNBC

Why Hosting The World Cup Is A Bad Idea For Countries

source

47 thoughts on “Why Hosting The World Cup Is A Bad Idea For Countries”

  1. There's often two Agenda's involved in these massive projects, the first agenda is the one that sounds good, e.g building infrastructure, showcasing the country, creating 'good, well paid jobs', and of course Legacy (whatever that means). The second agenda is the real one, and it usually involves MONEY, lots and lots of MONEY, for just a relatively small number of people.

    Reply
  2. The slave labor used to build the venues and infrastructure was a human rights violation.

    Qatar had foreign work force that were paid pennies for their hard labor and were forced to live in subhuman conditions!!

    Reply
  3. You cannot just give money to the people because it DISSAPEAR. What you need to fo is to invest the money, provide jobs and get more money to do the cycle again. Something the comunist, do not want to understand.

    Reply
  4. I can't wait for the 2026 World Cup when the United States is gonna host it along with Canada and Mexico. I honestly think this will be so successful faithfully begging for Canada Mexico in the United States to do this again. I could see it happening again every 12 to 16 years.

    Reply
  5. Its ok QATAR is rich even if the World Cup was operated at a NET LOSS due to the restrictions on alchohol etc, its still an honor to be one of the few Asian Countries to host one. and since it comes around every 4 years its not an opportunity that will come around easily.

    Reply
  6. The Olympics & World Cup should have a permanent host country–the USA. You've got infrastructure not just for every team, but for every athlete. There's stadiums big and small spread out across 3,000 miles in 50 states, for every one of them and their trainers & staff too. What's so hard about this? Put it here, problem solved. USA all the way

    Reply
  7. This "documentary" reeks more of political propaganda than anything else. Heavily under researched and dubious figures presented as facts. No mention as what these "experts" interviewed involvements in football-soccer is other than a guy who played midfield for the US in 2014.

    Reply
  8. 229b is probly under reported. They might have ended up spending over 500b. And despite all of that, they still didn't pay their workers who built their stadiums. Pathetic.

    Reply
  9. The stadium used to host the first game of 2014 world cup is now the home ground of Corinthians, one of the biggest South American Soccer clubs. It's used more than the NFL stadiums.

    Reply
  10. classical bmet99000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000০000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000

    Reply

Leave a Comment