IMPROVED 2025 UK Carrier Group vs 2025 Chinese Carrier Group (Naval Battle 72b) | DCS



GRIM REAPERS 2 (YouTube): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZzvHfFzIpMrvgAbgZDUX9A
PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/GrimReapers
0:00 Overview
1:15 Technology Update
3:15 Battle Details
10:53 Predictions
11:58 FIGHT!
Mods: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3kOAM2N1YJcbzwU5FCo0DRmCdF3owO1o
Link: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/a-guide-to-chinas-increasingly-impressive-air-to-air-missile-inventory

USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (YouTube): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZuXjkFY00p1ga3UyCBbR2w
GRIM REAPERS 2 (YouTube): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZzvHfFzIpMrvgAbgZDUX9A
GR PODCASTS: https://anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZuXjkFY00p1ga3UyCBbR2w/playlists?view=50&sort=dd&shelf_id=6
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: https://youtu.be/fDpL5eVCKlA

DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: https://www.redbubble.com/people/grmerchandise/shop?asc=u
PATREON monthly donations: https://www.patreon.com/GrimReapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: https://www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDonation

SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: https://grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): https://www.twitch.tv/grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/GrimReapersGroup/
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/GrimReapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): https://discord.gg/cATmE3d (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): https://discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)

OTHER
CAP’S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1g7op9YxNbWi8fogam0tK0yer1rRCLe7A
CAP’S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PsvBNEFS9hgo7p-tunMWOTQRR3HWtkqE?usp=sharing
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx

#DCSQuestioned #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #UK #China #Navy #AircraftCarrier #QueenElizabeth #Type003 #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military

source

44 thoughts on “IMPROVED 2025 UK Carrier Group vs 2025 Chinese Carrier Group (Naval Battle 72b) | DCS”

  1. During Operation Desert Storm, a F-16 Viper (Callsign Stroke 3) was fired upon by 6 Iraqi SAM sites during a air raid gone wrong, and dodged the missiles using only maneuvering since his flare dispenser had a malfunction he was unaware of. Could you guys try to replicate what happened and see if you could also beat multiple missile launches in a row without the use of flares?

    Reply
  2. I'd love to know why nobody has created a disposable/retractable pylon system. With the proclivity and advantages of stealth technology the ability to fire off an array of long range missiles and then convert the aircraft back to a stealth configuration to guide missiles/reattack seems like it would be a massively powerful technology

    Reply
  3. the US has grown complacent… more focused on the troops fe-fe's and making sure everyone gets called by their preferred pronouns. it doesn't help that the "leader of the free world" has one foot in the grave and is on the verge of becoming a sundowner…

    Reply
  4. Don't believe everything that defence jurno's spout it not always accurate, the only folks who really know hold the specs are those that build & use them & their recipes are more secret than a certain brand of fried chicken!
    The jurno's also thought that Ukraine would be a walkover for their neighbours, but this hasn't materialised either, yes the Chinese may have come on in leaps & bounds, but there's always constraints of time & money in any weapons system anywhere & in real life a lot of tech fails & missed opportunities are going to happen in a state where lying to save your butt on a regular basis is de rigour about the performance of your kit, I do believe the top folks of this regime can be a mite unforgiving on a personal level!

    Reply
  5. In the future maybe the human stealth F-35's should push-in more on that initial wave to increase the probability of kill instead of firing at max range since you know they can't see you until 25ish miles. Maybe fire at 50-60 miles and then get tf outta there?

    Reply
  6. Being American myself and learning a lot about the history of wars with the USA I have noticed we have been caught many many times with our pants down because we continue to make the same mistake of underestimating our enemies! It always seems to get a lot of us killed before the higher ups take the threats seriously and plan accordingly. I see no problem with your thinking in this video.

    Reply
  7. Best thing you said that you deliberately make full videos not snappy clickbait videos.
    Love to see the whole thing, along with the explanation of where it's not 100% simulated.
    Many battles change over time owing to the AI, the techonlogy or the GR pilots, and it's great to see it develop.

    Reply
  8. Hello GR's. I was an AO (Aviation Ordinanceman) back in the 80's. We were just getting F/A 18's on the flight deck at that time. I don't think it would be anywhere close to an hour for the first 20 or so planes to land and rearm. We could send up a rack of snake eyes (6) every 6 minutes and we would build the whole time the planes were out. And we were only one of the magazines. I think, if you found out how long it takes to fuel a plane, that would be your turn around time. Granted, things are very different today and there are still DCS issues, but I have heard you request naval advice before, so that's what I've got. Keep up the wonderfully long missions. How about a NATO attack on the Russian front lines. (Just in case they use a nuke.)

    Reply
  9. Are you aware that Chinese intend to put their new 5th-gen stealth fighter J-35 on to 003? That will be more of a match to F-35s, and will be more realistic scenario in 2025…

    Reply
  10. And this video again highlights the British problem, same as the last uk-china after all the jets have been taken out there isn't anything the Brits can use against the Chinese vessels

    Reply

Leave a Comment