TRUMP CHARGES DISMISSED, Federal Prosecutor May Face Criminal CHARGES w/Dudley Brown | Timcast IRL



BUY PILLOWS – https://www.mypillow.com/tim
SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW – https://castbrew.com/
Sign Up For Exclusive Episodes At https://timcast.com/

Merch – https://timcast.creator-spring.com

Hosts:
Tim @Timcast (everywhere)
Phil @PhilThatRemains (X)
Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere)
Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere)

Guests:
Dudley Brown @dudleywbrown (X)
Ronnie Adkins @RonnieAdkins_ (X)

Podcast available on all podcast platforms!

source

47 thoughts on “TRUMP CHARGES DISMISSED, Federal Prosecutor May Face Criminal CHARGES w/Dudley Brown | Timcast IRL”

  1. In the Grimm fairytales snow white was named for and described as such because that's what her mother who wanted a child ask for. Skin as white as snow, hair as dark as coal, and cheeks and lips of blood red.

    Reply
  2. Free Trade was supposed to be productive nations freely trading with each other, not productive nations getting rid of all of their production. If we don't produce anything, what is there to freely trade; are we trading a stable middle/working class for cheap shit from serf wages in another country?

    Reply
  3. Who is this idiot guest. Look at vote totals from last election to current …..that in itself is enough to raise eyebrows and suggest we should have held courts accountable to look into election fraud.

    Reply
  4. This m0r0n keeps bringing up Austrian and German economics, and yet, Austria and Germany both have 100% tariffs on American brand vehicles coming into their countries. Must be nice to keep leaning on another economic model, when it's being held up by tariffs from the US, and simultaneously be against the US charging others tariffs. This is why I hate when the older generations try to use AGE as a point for their argument. You are ignoring more than half of the equation to only make yourself right.

    Reply
  5. the 2nd amendment was to protect us from a tyrannical government so please explained to me how that means only small arms the government we would be going up against would have al of these weapons tanks bombs warships ect so why would someone think it only was talking about small arms. we would need to match the fire power they would bring to bear upon us

    Reply
  6. This guy is retarded, he uses a single simple naïve fact to argue everyone else is wrong about economics – always go for free trade because it's cheaper, outsource everything for profit.
    He's missing the point that when you outsource everything you have control of nothing during economic turmoil. Like Covid. Who made all the hand sanitizer and masks? Not US, Canada, Mexico. It was all China. All of NA struggled for supplies during a pandemic. You have to be a retard to think a foreign power will provide you supplies when they need them during hard times.
    A healthy economy is self sufficient and outsources luxuries, not staples. Otherwise your economy collapses during any instability in your trading partners.

    Reply
  7. I love when REALLY dumb people try to explain Trump by suggesting he means something other than what he said. Trump said: the election was stole-because anyone with an IQ somewhere north of 85 is completely and fully aware the election was stolen and not by covid but by fake ballots, rerunning piles of Ballots multiple times, throwing away republican ballots and false reporting what ballots actually indicated was peoples selection. Why do some real stupid people believe they are smart?

    Reply
  8. The discussion do not take in account the BIGGEST problem for local factories is not the cheaper Chinese workers but the USD as international currency for international commerce:
    This make EVERYTHING made abroad cheaper.

    Reply
  9. Annnnnd Dudley ruins it all at the end… "the 2nd applies to small arms." Fucking no. The 2nd amendment applies to…. all arms, period. It is explicitly meant for the People to be at least as well armed as the government, that means tactical nukes and warships in private hands.

    Reply
  10. I usually listen to this on Amazon audio. But the gun control talk irritated me so badly. If you read the Federalist papers it is pretty clear the founders absolutely intended for citizens to have access to the same arms as the military. It doesn't mention anything about small arms. It absolutely was intended to make sure the federal government did not restrict arms from the people. Even Alexander Hamilton basically said in Federalist 29 that they didn't have to worry about having a standing army because the citizenry would be armed at the same level as the military. And he was the most liberal founding father.

    Reply
  11. Free trade lowers the cost of goods for americans.. It is good for low income americans in one way.. but it farms out low skill jobs to other countries where labor is cheaper.. so if you have cheaper items, but you lose your job and have no income, what is better? is it better to have no income and cheaper items or a job that pays decent and items are more expensive?

    Reply
  12. People were offended by the Redskin name but has anyone every researched Vikings and what the Viking ised to do when they raided villages. Vikings done a lot worse to people than what Native Americans done. But yet Minnesota Vikings still uses Vikings as their team name.

    Reply
  13. As a union structural ironworker i challenge you to find any company that keeps shit hands around just because theyre in the union. It doesnt happen. If you cant do the job right youre run off. Yeah unions have their issues, and many professions definitely are negatively effected by them and probably shouldnt exist (looking at you, every single public sector union), but in industries like mine youd be an idiot to work non union for half the pay

    Reply
  14. NAGR is a fake gun rights organization who points to the other fake gun rights organization and says "but at least we aren't them"

    I was surprised to see you guys here had Dudley on, he is a known scammer in the 2A community and you can find plenty about it with a simple Google search

    Reply
  15. Dudley Brown is wrong about government spending being supply side economics. That is demand side economics. Government spending is always demand, not supply, as it consumed goods and services, not the provider thereof.

    Reply

Leave a Comment