🔴 YOU WANT TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL? 🔴
😎 Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/techchasm
😉 Or become an official Maiorianus member on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUF-OfqZ3hFCxnnKJ-lG1yg/join
🤗 One-Time Donation?
– PayPal: https://paypal.me/JS2TheFuture
– Bitcoin: bc1qv4lsfsplvfecrrgvmfclhga28we7mvh9563xdj
🔗 Share the video with anyone who might be interested (it helps a ton!)
🎦 FILMING EQUIPMENT WE USE: 🎦
Green screen: https://amzn.to/3ycrrRt
Camera: https://amzn.to/3yfpFyV
Cam link: https://amzn.to/3WCCQ6i
Ring light: https://amzn.to/3Yl1Ujq
Microphone: https://amzn.to/3Ynj1kO
Disclosures: Some links in the description are affiliate links which means that if you purchase something by clicking on one of them, your host Sebastian will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. In this way you will be supporting the channel to improve the video production quality at no extra cost to you.
📬 Contact us: [email protected]
#TechChasm
source
😎 Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/techchasm
The make jobs with SLS but the high price of not choose Robert Zubrin manned mission will be lose the Moon to China.
once we have a moonbase and self-sufficient production of oxygen and fuel, the crew could stay much longer on the moon. so, we need less launches . but the habitat needs to be protected from cosmic radiation and solar particle events.
Most efficient would be inflatable modules covered with loose regolith
The current US plan for going back to the moon sounds like the product of a committee of committees.
We need another Wernher von Braun.
to expensive not much point compared to the cost
Welcome back to space.
Because we're cheap and I'm not president of earth. So vote for me for president of earth please, lol
WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS!!!??
Also, please correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that SLS launches were over 4 billion per launch, not 1 billion. You did say “over 1 billion” so technically that wouldn’t be incorrect, but for my own knowledge I was curious on which one was more accurate.
It’s a real shame that western, primarily American bureaucracy, is the main reason Artemis lunar base has become so convoluted and overpriced. It baffles me how so many regular people are able to come up with much more time and cost efficient plans than the ones making them and signing the checks.
Truly embarrassing, all while during a face-off with a rising China. I hope I’m wrong but I do not have high hopes for continued western dominance in space. He who controls space controls the world.
Because there's no need to do so right now.
They will never do it,, they are spending all there money on war 🙁
CH4 production on the Moon also possible on the Moon? …Because Starship HLS
The point is to spend money, not necessarily to build a moon base
China and India can do it 20 times cheaper
FAA is blocking us over politics
the heaviest thing ever delivered to higher than low earth orbit was the Apollo 16 CSM/LM combo, which weighed around 43 tons, and the Saturn V had a capacity of 45 tons.
part of the weight was the Service Module that could get to the moon in 3 days. The unmanned Orion test took a week each way when going to the moon, because it had a smaller engine and less fuel. The current Orion/ ESA service module combo could easily be launched to the moon by the Falcon Heavy in expendible mode, so it's a cheaper and more reliable replacement to SLS, but FH does not match the capability of the Saturn 5. A lander would have to be sent in a different launch, leading to rezendevous issues.
Recurring costs would be $70 million Dragon launch, a launch for fuel and also another transfer stage…..
I missed your videos on space content! Keep up the good work
I'll believe it when I see it.
Can a Dragon Capsule make a lunar landing and then be refueled from a tanker lunar lander?
This is lockheed boing propaganda?
I'm surprised that any number of billionaires don't just do it on their own.