How Ukraine Exposed Putin's Biggest Weakness



Russia’s weak spot has been exposed and the Ukraine military is taking full advantage. Today we’re going to take a deeper look into the staggering losses the Russian army has faced against Ukraine’s epic anti-tank defenses. Is this the end of Russia’s armored dominance?

🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► https://www.youtube.com/c/theinfographicsshowOFFICIAL?sub_confirmation=1

🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► https://www.tiktok.com/@theinfographicsshow
Discord ► https://discord.gg/theinfoshow
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/TheInfographicsShow
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/TheInfoShow

💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
https://www.theinfographicsshow.com

📝 SOURCES:https://pastebin.com/63uswbtb

All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

Our Secret Weapon for growing on YouTube ➼ https://vidiq.com/theinfoshow/

source

43 thoughts on “How Ukraine Exposed Putin's Biggest Weakness”

  1. Info graphics and their bias videos. Why Russia isn't out of men as yet? How is Russia not dropped out of the war as yet? Why is Ukrain struggling to get men on the front line since no Ukrain suffer any lost?

    Reply
  2. Im a fan of your show, but i must say that when you are reporting on the Ukraine/Russia war…your not telling all the facts and its easy to tell your show is one sided. No disrespect, but you should be more open about the fact that Ukraine is losing this war, their blitz into Russia was a failure and is stalled and while they are fighting a losing battle in Russia, their home cities are being bombed back to the stone age.

    Reply
  3. — On Tanks: They are at the very least worthy of continuing to do advanced research on. But you said it yourself: Tactics. They need to change. I feel as though the tank has a place. It's a necessary kit that all the greatest minds keep trying to find ways around. This isn't a obsolete or must have argument. It's a line graph that has been switching sides for decades. Even if we don't field tanks in the future, not continuing R&D on them would be a big mistake. Secondary lines/support roles are also viable for the tank, quickly swapping to advancement on the ground. Trick is picking the right time, with which, that hasn't changed from the beginning. Flexible mobility. Were I say 'King' of the United States, the tank would stay, and I would encourage development to continue, even long after they were not viable.
    Why couldn't a tank launch it's own drone/anti-drone swarm? Right now the tank is where full fledged electric civilian vehicles are right now. Where-as battery technology is say Tesla's problem, defense systems is the tanks. And, they're cheaper ways to build tanks. Smaller, remotely operated units. Cheaper, easier to maintain. It's like the government goes all in on 'The Green New Deal' (spare me I know the politics) when what we really could use are golf carts for short, fair-weather trips to the grocery store equipped with 12v batteries you can buy at an auto parts store (no rare earth materials).
    There is where I sound like a hypocrite: Go all in on future tank technology. Green New Deal. Just pointing out outside of budget and relevance, the powers that be don't know what they're doing. What's that saying? When you have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.

    Reply
  4. "The age of the tank is over." Just like the age of dog fighting aircraft with guns was over with the advent of air to air missiles in the Vietnam war and our planes repeatedly got chewed up by their Migs with their guns. Guns got back in planes fast and are still there. So too with the drones. No way drones will obliviate the need for tanks. Something else will replace tanks, not anytime soon. Drones are small, very electronic, GPS, ubiquitous and will no doubt advance technologically. They will always have a place but there will be electronic or kinetic technological solutions to their presence well before tanks are retired for some other much more tactical, strategic and or technological reasons. No doubt they will increase in size, range, capability, and increased variety of functions. Drones against drones, the means to foul drones propulsion and guidance, etc are on the way. Already land based gunnery systems analogous to the naval Phalanx CIWS (SEE-wiz) are mounted and fielded on tank chassis for aircraft. No big stretch in the least for the same or similar to counter drones. Say drone vs drone takes off in the skies over the battlefield. The battlefield now without tanks simply because of comparative mosquitoes above? NOPE. Innovation always brings change and transitional periods because of change and advancements. We are there in transition.

    Reply
  5. Allways fun to watch your videos. They are as allways based on fantasy and not real world. Russia is not losing and will continue this war til Putin is satisfied with outcome. For information, he gets alot of money from gas and oil export…. Well, u didnt know that i guess…

    Reply
  6. Oryx is NOT a reliable source of information. Russia recovers a lot of tanks to be repaired and reused. Along with Western equipment to be shown off in Moscow lol. Russia is learning how to intercept Western systems and shoots down most of the attacks now.
    Clickbait headline. Try harder.

    Reply

Leave a Comment