Join the official Space Race Discord server and meet like minded people today! β https://discord.gg/eM9nES3nUz
Last Video: Why NASA Is Developing A NEW Nuclear Rocket!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8Di7fXHZrg&ab_channel=TheSpaceRace
βΊBecome a member today: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeMcDx6-rOq_RlKSPehk2tQ/join
βΊSupport the channel by purchasing from our merch store: https://shop.theteslaspace.com/
βΊ Join Our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/jeZgzNUcBw
βΊ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theteslaspace
βΊ X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSpaceRaceYT
βΊ Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheTeslaSpace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0SQRy0-pZBjdnBaU6JsWr4B
SpaceX News and Updates: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0QGbrNimSIWKYeyQ7JjENhE
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humansβ mission to explore the universe. Weβll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. Weβll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If youβre interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space raceβ¦ youβve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
βΊ Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: https://www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: [email protected]
#Spacex #Space #Mars
source
Join the official Space Race Discord server and meet like minded people today! – https://discord.gg/eM9nES3nUz
The tall top heavy Starship design is the pretty bad vehicle to try to land on the moon. It will probably fall over.
Good citizens don't ask questions.
Any footage of the lunar surface after 1974? Why not I say? Mars has 8K footage and our closest body the moon has 0 rovers…. suspect is it not? Anyone? Then our world from distance is never ever shown to us is it? Why not I say? All the satellites up there far away all for what? To put no cameras on at all? Dodgy as f*ck. β€
So, they can't build a Saturn rocket with todays tech and efficient engines to go back to the moon? π€― Has Hollywood forgotten how to film?
Is there a star link? I thought I saw a star link in the sky last year
Are you sniffing the glue pot again
Excellent job … very informative and the humility with which you gave the material is commendable.
I love how you suck NASA and Elon's dick in all of your other videos, and now you make it seem like some impossible goal that will never be accomplished. I hate you, and your feminine, Gen Z voice. Burn in hell you Canadian progressive democrat piece of shit!
I'm sick of the cool-factor glib headline projects. "To the Moon". So what, been done.
Find a system to make launching shit into space much less costly, and then revisit the topic.
Awesome video! I loved the editorial. Dustin, from "Smarter everyday" also had very strong candor with NASA in front of them. the 6 days orbit is ridiculous.
No one has managed to explain how it was possible to accomplish a moon landing as early as 1969, considering the delicate details and technology involved. But we are told it was done: Man made itto the moon and back!
Many years down, we're still fantasizing about a redo of it even after achieving great leaps in technology, even with all the blue prints of the successful mission!
Would it be wrong to suggest that the source of intelligence that was involved in that successful mission was largely "outsourced"? If so, did we piss off the "out source" that they can't help us any more? I mean, over many decades we are still failing to achieve what was achieved within a decade.
If the moon landing was done, who made it possible? Definitely not man! Because if it was man then by today moon landings would be a walk over.
I so enjoyed 15 minutes of listening to your unsupported opinions.
can't pay for his wars but wants to land on the moon, where Nasa never went…
the cameraman was the first man on the moon so he could film Armstrong climb down the ladder, they left him behind to film the pod leaving the moon
NASA fake everything they are defrauding the taxpayers out of $24.875 billion for 2024 alone and trillions since 1960 to give you CGI, SpaceX does the same
The moon is a cold translucent light that does not reflect sunlight. You cannot land on a cold translucent light. No one has been beyond the firmament. There is no evidence of an outer space with space balls. The earth is observably, measurably, and provably flat. We see too far, there's no curvature blocking or obscuring anything from anywhere. Above 130,000' the evidence turns into cartoons and computer graphics. There is no evidence that the moon is a physical object. You cannot test outer space on the ground, there's no chamber for that, only high altitude chambers. Gravity is merely a macrocosmic unicorn theory devoid of any evidence. Outer space is pagan Babylonian and Imhotep black magic sun worshipping. Copernicus position required ordination and he certainly did not talk like a "scientist." Newton recanted gravity in his letters. And sticks and shadows or wells and shadows work just fine inside of any flat room with a light. NASA was founded by a bunch of NAZI's to create our prison planet.
My super stupid plan to get to the moon in 3 starship launches that avoids every problem you listed…. Launch one starship that has a nuclear reactor to act as a tug…. launch another with the entire non engine and fuel section as a giant faring that contains a massive cable with a small probe on the end, use the tug to move the cable starship as close to the moon as it needs to be and then launch the probe like a harpoon into the moons surface with the remainder of the Starship acting as the anchor to a lunar elevator….return the tug ship to earth orbit, launch the manned starship to orbit, use Tug to take it to the lunar elevator have a lander from either it or the elevator ship take the astronauts to surface and back…also may need an additional Starship to refuel manned shit for it to land, not sure how that works… or might be easier to upgrade a falcon heavy to crew certified to take crew to the lunar elevator… whatever is easier/cheaper….
Evil on earth
Evil in space.
Apollo did it back in the 1960's. It's already been done. Why is it so difficult now? Go back and redo what was done.
I thought SpaceX had developed an Orbital Fuel Depot platform for Lunar & Martian missions?!
Didn't go the first time
All I know is water finds its own level π€
Do really people realistically believe Elon Musk will land anything, anywhere?
Why do we need to go? – itβs a shit hole. Been there and done that- move on.
No men ever were on moon, only drones, robots, probes, remote controlled moon buggies!
That way, the photos and the rocks from the Moon are real. But not human made… machine made!
At least the Russians were honest, admitting they have never sent a man to the Moon.
The problem of enough fuel, to take off from the Moon!
The extreme radiation from the Sun and also from flying through the Van Allen belt!
They are lying us from what they saw in space.
There is something dark. The astronauts hallucinated, as they went too far from Earth!
I believe the technology is already out there with magnetic fields doing all the pushing and pulling we have the knowledge we are just not using it
Trump is our last hope for equality amongst all Americans
Who believes that in 1969 we landed on the moon. Now with technology we have not returned to it. So did they land on the moon, or was it Area 51 or 54 in America. Restricted areas to general public.
Nasa has tricked america out of $50 million per day for the passes 50 years bases 100% on their bs story of landing on the moon in the 60s. Defund nasa
The moon really is a artificial satellite…
NASA has never left this π earth before.
There is no way a rocket can break thru the firmament…
There's a serpent's tongue on NASA's logo.
That's from the garden of Eden…
The first LIE was from Satan…