NYT Says Taylor Swift Is Bigger Than The Beatles!? WTF



In this episode, I talk about a New York Times article I came across that tries to answer the question if Taylor Swift is as popular as some of the biggest artists in the past.

💫 The Beato Ultimate Bundle — $99 FOR ALL OF My Courses: ⇢ https://rickbeato.com/

📘— The Beato Book Interactive – $99.00 value
🎸 — Beato Beginner Guitar – $159.00 value
👂— The Beato Ear Training Program – $99.00 value
🎸— The Quick Lessons Pro Guitar Course – $79.00 value

… all for just $99.00

Get it here: https://rickbeato.com/

My Beato Club supporters:
Justin Scott
Terence Mark
Jason Murray
Lucienne Kilpatrick
Alexander Young
Jason Wagner
Todd Ladner
Rob Kline
Nicholas Long
Tim Benson
Leonardo Martins da Costa Rodrigues
Eddie Perez
David Solomon
MICHAEL JOYCE
Stephen Stubbs
colin stead
Jonathan Wentworth-Linton
Patrick Payne
MATTHEW KARIS
Matthew Barouch
Shaun Samuels
Danny Kurywchak
Gregory Reedy
Sean Coleman
Alexander Verbitskiy
CL Turner
Jason Pappafotis
John Fulford
Margaret Carno
Robert C
David M Combs
Eric Flatt
Reto Spoerli
Herr Moritz Adam
Monte St. Johns
Jon Beezley
Peter DeVault
Eric Nabstedt
Eric Beggs
Rich Germano
Brian Bloom
Peter Pillitteri
Piush Dahal

source

42 thoughts on “NYT Says Taylor Swift Is Bigger Than The Beatles!? WTF”

  1. I know almost all songs of the Beatles and can sing about 50% of them – and was born after they started making records. I know not one single song of Taylor Swift. Yes, if you play one and tell me: This is from her, I probably know some of her songs – from radio. But she is so far away from the Beatles.. omfg. And my kids listen o the Beatles, to Queen, to Steely Dan, to David Bowie, to AC/DC, to Pink Floyd. Not to Taylor Swift.

    Reply
  2. Great, informative clip Rick!

    One thing I think should not be omitted in this equation is that in the 60s, (Beatles, for instance) music was so important that mid- to low-income classes spent actual hard- earned dollars regularly on buying records (plus going to concerts of course). And that when the cost of living in most Western countries was very high (check it out), plus spending 5 US dollars on an album in 1969 meant spending 43 dollars in 2024…

    Compare that with streaming folks.. And The Beatles did actually sell millions of records… So Taylor Swift "bigger"??…

    Reply
  3. Honestly this is kinda inspiring because I recently made a banger of a bed track but am at a loss for words… maybe i can find a pop star to write some words to it. It deserves to be more than just my ringtone lol

    Reply
  4. It remains to be seen. "Bigger" is a strange word. In what way? It's like comparing her to Mozart or Beethoven. The Beatles were hugely influential musically. EVERYONE listened to them. EVERYONE EVERYWHERE knew and sang along to every song they wrote. I find her intelligent, and she's brilliantly successful with her young fans, but as an adult, honestly, I can't remember any of her songs, after listening to them.

    Reply
  5. I think the the answer to the question is… If in 54 years from now (seeing the Beetles broke up 54 years ago) is there going to be a mega artist who is being compared to Taylor Swift? My guess is even in 108 years from now that mega artist would more likely still be compared to the Beetles than to Taylor Swift!

    Reply
  6. I was getting a bit jaded with your content but you’ve just explained why I’m still a subscriber. Great video, very informative and probably quite brave given her followers Rick

    Reply
  7. Comparing hand made music, containing sweat love & tears, with music of an industrial music machine, only existing to make some guys a bit richer….? Well, that is really hard to decide…

    Reply
  8. Common sense is not that common. In my youth I was blissfully unaware of lots of music which I later learned to appreciate so in that light I think it's fine if today's youngsters adulate Taylor Swift. If there are lots of older people who in terms of pop swear only by Taylor Swift, however, now that I would find disheartening.

    Reply
  9. The Beatles' fans were never numerous enough to cause a seismic disturbance at a concert. Talylor Swift's fans are. Just because she and they don't fit in with the old white guy demographic is no reason to get all antsy and ignore the facts.

    Reply
  10. Well one thing she has going for her is music is pretty bad overall for what's new and being promoted. So it's pretty easy to stand out from the pack for her. I couldn't even tell you 5 artists in the top 40 today. I knew every song and artist in the 80's and 90's. Things have really gone down hill.

    Reply
  11. I have been a Beatles fan for 60 years and I doubt I could name one Swift song. However, this is about NYT, not Taylor Swift. She just doesn’t seem like the kind of person who would compare herself with the Beatles. NYT sells “news” and it’s achieved its goal with this story.

    Reply
  12. Musician here. I found this review to be a cheap shot to get comments. Taylor might have sold more than the Beatles but it's a completely different world order with the internet sending music around the globe to anyone with a phone. She's stayed insanely popular for two decades, not an easy trick. No need to "bring her down a notch". Check out Taylor Swift's Tiny Desk Concert. Just her, piano and guitar. Maybe not a once in a century talent like Paul McCartney and John Lennon, but she's definitely talented.

    Reply
  13. One of the refreshing things about your channel is that you DON'T behave like other Youtubers and you avoid cheap gimmicks like jump cuts and whatever's happening at 0:02. You earned 4 million subscribers by staying true to yourself. I really, really hope you'll keep doing that.

    Reply
  14. I'm convinced that the reward system for music is actually backwards.

    like, awful music always succeeds, it gets put on top lists of best songs, it gets awards, it gets plastered on all the charts, they get their photoshopped faces put in magazines, they get pop culture cameos and all that, but good music rarely gets any recognition.

    so, my theory is that, awards are actually bad, if you get an award, it means you make bad music, and if you don't get any awards, then you made good music… that's the only thing that makes sense here.

    Reply
  15. She’s great. Talented, has the whole package needed for today’s pop music. That being said, the Beatles outshine everyone by far and I don’t know how that can ever change. It’s set in stone now.

    Reply
  16. My Phone rang in my pocket while talking to my Doctor. My ringtone is Ticket to Ride. She said "do you have to answer that"? I said no lets just sing along with the ring tone. She then said "Im sorry i dont know that song. However My grandpa will sing it with you ."

    Reply

Leave a Comment