Russia's Top Nuke Targets



Imagine the most terrifying Russia scenario you can think of.

Putin, on the brink of regime collapse, orders a massive nuclear strike at the West—a final, catastrophic move. ICBMs, 15,000 mph fast, laden with warheads, launch.

But where?

Unlikely, yet not impossible. Russia owns 6,000 nuclear weapons, 1,600 deployed. Where would they hit? A question from the Cold War, now resurging.

In this video, we explore Putin’s potential targets, starting with the U.S.

#themilitaryshow

source

38 thoughts on “Russia's Top Nuke Targets”

  1. But reality is is that once the the nukes are deployed the US would already be launching its entire arsenal because of that point it's use it or lose it but at the end of the day let's hope none of this happens p because it would be a bad day for all parties and the only people that would potentially survive are third world countries in the southern regions

    Reply
  2. We worried about this for decades throughout the Cold War years and with the exception of the Cuban Missile Crisis this situation is more likely to occur today. Ironic.

    Reply
  3. Your opening line describing Putin as being deranged and seeing his "empire" collapsing stopped me from watching any further. I have found that the West, read USA, EU Israel etc will always accuse their opponents of doing the very same thing that they themselves are doing.

    Reply
  4. Eh, there is a factor in Drake's Equation that represents the length of time that an advanced civilization (i.e., that has figured out how to use electromagnetic waves for communication) exists before it extinguishes itself.

    Reply
  5. Russia stole our technology and our name for our submarine and took it as their own we have a submarine called Posiedon and russia took posiedon and named it for the Nuclear torpedo

    Reply
  6. Unless they bring one into the country somehow without being detected by satellite due to nuclear signature, good luck getting anything into our airspace. Israel has the iron dome, we have the same thing on a much much larger scale . It can handle a global assault and take minimal damage.

    Reply
  7. Please understand and stop misleading people. This will have nothing to do with Russian 'desperation'. It's just established Russian military doctrine. It WILL happen if NATO takes it to that level. There won't be any bluffing involved. Bluffing plays absolutely no part in nuclear deterrence. The threat of mutually assured destruction is based on certainty, not bluff. Our future is absolutely in our own hands here. If we think nuclear Armageddon is preferable to meeting Russia's insistence on a neutral Ukraine, then that's out choice. Finis. Please spare a thought for my young grandchildren.

    Reply
  8. None of this garbage is going to happen. It's all smoke and mirrors. Jesus Christ is in control. First the Rapture of the True Church the Bride of Jesus Christ is taken out of this world. Revelation 3. The end the Tribulation and Great Tribulation. Revelation chapter 4-19.
    Then Jesus Christ and the Bride of Christ come back to defeat the heathen nations Revelation 20-22. Satan is bound. 1,000 millennial reign. The final judgement. The New Heaven and the New Earth. We won in Christ Jesus.

    Reply
  9. all of these videos say the same thing and say first strike would avoid most of Oregon and California.. but California has Beale and Travis and Edward and the one near SLO. Not that I want them to be struck at all but I'm pretty sure there is missing bases on the first strike plan for Russian. hell they might just hit everything at once

    Reply
  10. Russia will use it because Russia vs 32 countries…No country can win a conventional if it up against 32 countries.If Russia also built an alliance similar in number then it might not,but for 1 vs 32 Russia”s strategy has to be nuclear and it is exactly that

    Reply

Leave a Comment